From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DD3D1E00D2B; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:38:53 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (pj0585[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C43E00D26 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id g62so56817749wme.1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:38:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eJ/mnCD5WVtncjLFThgclm5AzMQl5aHJ8bUlsp8dQe4=; b=Ge5KxpZjfcuRIAchdu3VcOI8hhcXHxyWdNH1OE6OchGGxllCjvsn7cSSn5lvHeCtrQ jpf9uD8c0Uee4cys4d9eK7A4s8d8w/7B9eQOAqdpmISrjfExmtL2GGxeM9cXowXFGQiK S0pa4OOg06jUn9cmRz16COOBuXOyVvGlemyfZkbKjxpqJbcspC43UaPxoYJ1qy11fzJd ek4EuyQYzZSUXY2ya0OyJuDbUf9Vx1vADNzMhAhYKVwRAE3x/oPXMjyEIg1Yb3d3CoDE hekY1mqbJxGehHi74cb2cQQCfvfK6Dk2U2ftED7Kfmm+ILJkPiJTRiKwGmU5N7eKFUPg 4PtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eJ/mnCD5WVtncjLFThgclm5AzMQl5aHJ8bUlsp8dQe4=; b=UHsFsDKws1d62Hosq/ukeDZIk0kNzkWgUNvvvnH+Ma48KX1ieHwxxUw54yaFyB7YrO ZzaV9MCX5g/BDcpAwszxYnXnBzQc76UegGVACMuXSUog3A9cVDQrn6CUDhJ3cjyIv17O DzTF9hCua6QeI9w6RicsjJNH+MEqLA0fBwTipNtqhnxrkiB6JB4CyFi+2vrUg5HS2e35 GXyUnbhukHC797Q1qsl6o1+t/jd4xLGmR0QJy6yumJc2RRDJj1kusMSqog5UEcP1O16V DtjFsdXr1ivyfF0odrarHpIdCiu990OfnwOv8+Gd7xOfYoSmoND6EOMA8R+6K3mUPI9s AeuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQhDQNrCRHV4p3odQOkUDZkPMcpKD4Ot9r80Ag8bxCW2ho+cOVXHBqZguE4R8uZB1KQLMb7s+9Aq9Plhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.100 with SMTP id bv4mr16092662wjb.11.1455539932345; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.94.133 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:38:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:08:52 +0530 Message-ID: From: Prasant J To: Poky Project Subject: Can I force a particular recipe to rebuild every time? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:38:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I'm writing my own layer for the Intel Atom Board. - Is there a way to force a recipe to be rebuild every time core-image-minimal-initramfs is built? - Is there a ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS equivalent for core-image-minimal-initramfs image? Regards, Pj