From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:39169 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754018Ab2DEVj6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:39:58 -0400 Received: by yhmm54 with SMTP id m54so1024472yhm.19 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:39:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 23:39:57 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20120405_234001_707582_9ADB768E) Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: fix an issue in ieee80211_tx_info count field management From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: John Linville , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, I noticed a possible issue in the status count field management of the ieee80211_tx_info data structure. In particular, when the AGGR processing is employed, ath_tx_complete_aggr() sets status.rates[].count just for the first frame and not for others belonging to the same burst, leading to wrong statistic data in the mac80211 debug file system. Regards Lorenzo Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi --- --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct list_head *head, bool internal); static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf, struct ath_tx_status *ts, int nframes, int nbad, - int txok); + int txok, bool update_info); static void ath_tx_update_baw(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_atx_tid *tid, int seqno); static struct ath_buf *ath_tx_setup_buffer(struct ath_softc *sc, @@ -542,9 +542,12 @@ if (rc_update && (acked_cnt == 1 || txfail_cnt == 1)) { memcpy(tx_info->control.rates, rates, sizeof(rates)); - ath_tx_rc_status(sc, bf, ts, nframes, nbad, txok); + ath_tx_rc_status(sc, bf, ts, nframes, nbad, + txok, true); rc_update = false; - } + } else + ath_tx_rc_status(sc, bf, ts, nframes, nbad, + txok, false); ath_tx_complete_buf(sc, bf, txq, &bf_head, ts, !txfail); @@ -2068,7 +2071,7 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf, struct ath_tx_status *ts, int nframes, int nbad, - int txok) + int txok, bool update_info) { struct sk_buff *skb = bf->bf_mpdu; struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; @@ -2083,16 +2086,16 @@ tx_rateindex = ts->ts_rateindex; WARN_ON(tx_rateindex >= hw->max_rates); - if (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) { + if ((tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) && update_info) { tx_info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU; BUG_ON(nbad > nframes); + tx_info->status.ampdu_len = nframes; + tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = nframes - nbad; } - tx_info->status.ampdu_len = nframes; - tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = nframes - nbad; if ((ts->ts_status & ATH9K_TXERR_FILT) == 0 && - (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK) == 0) { + (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK) == 0 && update_info) { /* * If an underrun error is seen assume it as an excessive * retry only if max frame trigger level has been reached @@ -2134,7 +2137,7 @@ txq->axq_ampdu_depth--; if (!bf_isampdu(bf)) { - ath_tx_rc_status(sc, bf, ts, 1, txok ? 0 : 1, txok); + ath_tx_rc_status(sc, bf, ts, 1, txok ? 0 : 1, txok, true); ath_tx_complete_buf(sc, bf, txq, bf_head, ts, txok); } else ath_tx_complete_aggr(sc, txq, bf, bf_head, ts, txok, true); --