From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhJKh-0002os-Mz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 08:48:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhJKb-0005gn-30 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 08:48:55 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::231]:48977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhJKa-0005gf-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 08:48:49 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id na1so2829610bkb.8 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lukego@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20130528115326.GB21107@redhat.com> References: <20130527093409.GH21969@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <51A496C4.1020602@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20130528115326.GB21107@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:48:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: Luke Gorrie Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a743eb5084504ddc6afe5 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [snabb-devel:276] Re: snabbswitch integration with QEMU for userspace ethernet I/O List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "snabb-devel@googlegroups.com" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Julian Stecklina --bcaec51a743eb5084504ddc6afe5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 28 May 2013 13:53, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Implementing out of process device logic would absolutely be useful for > qemu, for security. > This sounds wonderful from my perspective. The whole PCI device implemented in my process according to the Virtio spec? What would it take to make this possible? I really want snabbswitch <-> guest I/O with as little involvement from Linux and QEMU as possible. Personally I can work much more effectively in the snabbswitch code than in QEMU or Linux and that's why I haven't implemented Stefan's design, despite having several times sat down with the intention of doing so :) --bcaec51a743eb5084504ddc6afe5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28 May 2013 13:53, Michael S= . Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
Implementing out of process device = logic would absolutely be useful for
qemu, for security.

This sounds w= onderful from my perspective. The whole PCI device implemented in my proces= s according to the Virtio spec? What would it take to make this possible?

I really want snabbswitch <-> guest I= /O with as little involvement from Linux and QEMU as possible.=A0

Personally I can work much more effectively in = the snabbswitch code than in QEMU or Linux and that's why I haven't= implemented Stefan's design, despite having several times sat down wit= h the intention of doing so :)


--bcaec51a743eb5084504ddc6afe5--