Dear qemu-devel hackers,

I am writing to ask for some technical advice. I am making embarrassingly
slow progress on finding a good way to integrate the Snabb Switch
user-space ethernet switch (http://snabb.co/snabbswitch/) with QEMU for
efficient ethernet I/O.

Stefan put us onto the highly promising track of vhost/virtio. We have
implemented this between Snabb Switch and the Linux kernel, but not
directly between Snabb Switch and QEMU guests. The "roadblock" we have hit
is embarrasingly basic: QEMU is using user-to-kernel system calls to setup
vhost (open /dev/net/tun and /dev/vhost-net, ioctl()s) and I haven't found
a good way to map these towards Snabb Switch instead of the kernel.

We have several ideas on the table and we would love some technical
feedback on what sounds like a good way forward -- ideally a better
alternative that we haven't thought of at all, not being QEMU gurus
ourselves.

Here are the ideas on the table right now:

1. Use FUSE to implement a complete clone of /dev/net/tun and
/dev/vhost-net inside Snabb Switch. Implement every ioctl() that QEMU
requires.

2. Extend QEMU to support a user-user IPC mode of vhost. In this mode QEMU
would not use ioctl() etc but some other system calls that are appropriate
for IPC between user-space processes.

3. Use the kernel as a middle-man. Create a double-ended "veth" interface
and have Snabb Switch and QEMU each open a PF_PACKET socket and accelerate
it with VHOST_NET.

#1 is appealing _if_ it can really be done. Risk is that we hit a
road-block when implementing the behavior of the ioctl()s, for example have
trouble mapping guest memory or getting hold of an eventfd, and that FUSE
is kinda heavy-weight.

#2 is appealing _if_ it can be done in a nice way. I don't know which
system calls would be appropriate and I don't know how to write the code
inside QEMU in a neat way.

#3 is appealing _if_ there is no significant overhead e.g. an extra memory
copy inside the kernel, or if it's really quick to do as a temporary
stop-gap.

We would love some words of wisdom about the options above and/or a new
idea :-)

Cheers,
-Luke