From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AA5C282C4 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 15:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3D8217D8 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 15:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AJhVx0NQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726925AbfBIPyr (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2019 10:54:47 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:38517 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726741AbfBIPyr (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2019 10:54:47 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id c19-v6so5461998lja.5 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 07:54:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=98nIhf4HRqtTQrspsRRLDR0kRKggpcMXXCsAgAOFUm8=; b=AJhVx0NQcb8rPj2wC7WEO9TCnTueL4ho0CAK5m5dXxE4NjI2jrlSXzlwUycG6/TmrA W6LxxDLkICudmKa9RSItX8eMI2WWNJsDyh+IQY5WeKnPlXegf5O4ywaVueW4DVk5neRa 9DNoIWOJRRRY5IM6cARVPya8gYB73x6Z6tG1V5BdMrOq0zh7KAdlxwCcZL146Gi0vrgo hrYu2u0tS8a+4Qkbt8BqFrt3KDFnMZVOfOpVhrLtAq/4He1l9zHK7+75qDTgsmjnwST4 e6cVBtJVx8ecnWUdtSIKwQUpfpiHYkVNdi7I9rJ8zcJxbRBOhywWeLwr0srFP9MgcNfa iujA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=98nIhf4HRqtTQrspsRRLDR0kRKggpcMXXCsAgAOFUm8=; b=Ey+tgdFgqadZbEiYLcwyT9bJmBAbqoX02QkRCXhCoXXnrMObr+It9LwOI4SxTtqIey FgJnevuCoDSUuSL6wC5hhZxrJ5JP5L8QK/OAsmHKT/lK/CEUaLtbeqBuITfe8Cg7Caf/ d87rvjpXIv6SZfddIlNtz+0MyFSmvCYbclMfNnCo3NSxx1kZvzg22eyMEj83w+tLLBhR y775Wq1WOlwWoJNpmkND5kawH+F20DpvtOR5EBfim0mLmf20JuIBRa4hndDJ5ckm2tPW Iiv0HhyM0v09wMOo+uht3oLySb9Cn3uSA0ETDQo2hlmesbvp1oBCoubAgdP7QPXHal7N /pxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaWqrF//hq4bu8NkrkAe/SRasjUtGCbJtwzx3P6D726MO6mrALg 1bvE2qjPyWza8sE+OJOsw7tB1KjN49wupmdRnbY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbEcsIjoyTMHaCwCjLKvWqpYyqhEe981IIAVBlcQfMcrq+hXrq4YPZAYuDT/h5857S4Laxl9rAjIQ4BIdDdHyk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b99:: with SMTP id z25-v6mr2286863lji.197.1549727684567; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 07:54:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <067294dc4721cd52b87ccc579033b59336588bdd.camel@mellanox.com> <20190206.140314.1579572356051091256.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: From: Ian Kumlien Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:54:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ISSUE][4.20.6] mlx5 and checksum failures To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Cong Wang , David Miller , Saeed Mahameed , Linux Kernel Network Developers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:29 PM Ian Kumlien wrote > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ian Kumlien wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > > > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I don't know why =/ > > > > > > > > > > weird, Maybe a real check-summing issue/corruption on the PCI ?! > > > > > > > > Actually, it seems to have been introduced in 4.20.6 - 4.20.5 works just fine > > > > Great, the difference is only 120 patches. > > > that is bisect-able, it will only take 5 iterations to find the > > > offending commit. > > > > I just wish it wasn't a server that takes, what feels like 5 minutes to boot... > > > > All of these seas of sensors 2d and 3d... =P > > > > But, yep, that's the plan > > Huh, spent most of the day with two bisects and none of them yielded > any results.... > > Looks like I'll have to start investigating the elrepo kernel-ml build =( Just realized that it's not an entirely fair comparison - since retpolines wasn't enabled, damned old compilers...