From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Hockin Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next #2 28/39] natsemi: stop using net_device.{base_addr, irq}. Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20120410.193042.1153959183942458232.davem@davemloft.net> <20120410.200212.1031414009653598743.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:51057 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753136Ab2DKAUE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:20:04 -0400 Received: by yenl12 with SMTP id l12so242588yen.19 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120410.200212.1031414009653598743.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I agree. The patches to this driver have been very few and far between, but even those I am largely unable to review any more. I'm more than willing to hand it off to someone who can do a better job= of it Tim On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:02 PM, David Miller wro= te: > From: Tim Hockin > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:39:31 -0700 > >> OK, so that addresses that concern. :) =C2=A0Thanks. >> >> Overall nothing in the CL stands out as bad, except for the IO vs MM= IO >> BAR thing, which I can not answer with certainty any more. > > If you capacity to review patches to the driver for anything other > than trivial changes is close to zero, which it appears to be, you > might consider whether you should be listed in MAINTAINERS for it any > long. =C2=A0And also, therefore, whether this driver should be marked > as Maintained. >