From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37748C3F2D1 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFF720848 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QjmpFRwS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726177AbgCERi5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:38:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:39868 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725963AbgCERi5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:38:57 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id f10so7023066ljn.6; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:38:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AjhdRYjDPFMTb22nPTZry4E/4CciJROpmnc6zv5X8Vg=; b=QjmpFRwS72p2y1jT2grAaixO/Fj7ExldbHvxqFnHIKGSN7mp6yvTg0LTjqIIv4VkKO +WeHfN069Od8rFuh/KQVN97gl+DSe7axo04atuXl9f3nNPKdqwsDBqrUMpoT2V8i02oJ MjGAgwBStoHwVRPFDWUhNYSUsc2fxLk30NSWpX8qyhTNw3DJKe/NsN+H0MngerHmysdz gc9BtobLIwkInmSNYyuVRObjuP6pEt2iY/14lT0IiZobgAqfvVHTaqrTnVTU9woZ7WFD XL29FtnZZ4By9EgqLR3pNX2T1zSNcbFPYE2VNu88hLdnvbnWXVujtgYn+zf5tih+K5nJ hOyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AjhdRYjDPFMTb22nPTZry4E/4CciJROpmnc6zv5X8Vg=; b=Jhg03ol3zo4hbt5US8iK0uzRlCfkKwsW1IAnEWT0i/vr42AqXODx4+q1Y4/sUTQg4Q pVouh4L444sCv20uBWafL2bnOmVb+XnXOxgAK8bY03300HqI1zvlQpiChtqKzRl5cKBG ty6PAYcyI97+tCENqdAuUYJwYZKGNV23F19Hl7v8UVFPQhZMyr36WuN7/NmTka85Ukyr JpXIGGP4Hjw+kmQGzqACfK/2tju0WOHgQCK1DYDO7mBy1OoaWLciHLDOq77fGK+jI2Qo rzkvAneHFMf7uPDvA/R5CUgpIOyWJoBaXjEOTd4knxHV4QMVvuzMmnOZyl5o+7VZ9U0X UhkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0EgScrLtixEzC3APjZm87hSr/9ruFKFN79VfY66tZvpqapqhwS DmcqC1Q52ntHYAyurFbJ8bxJuwhuhqc3dYDKp3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtXBGwHlMSdbyhPktHbkhplsEt4jfLLEKNjPpDTwBv5BGuitJHDawiTWbUYw94VLKGibffNlVaOONDOSHX362Y= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:760f:: with SMTP id r15mr6128149ljc.234.1583429933466; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:38:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200305175528.5b3ccc09@canb.auug.org.au> <715919f5-e256-fbd1-44ff-8934bda78a71@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:38:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (bpf_trace) To: KP Singh Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , bpf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:32 AM KP Singh wrote: > > This fails as we added bpf_test_run_tracing in net/bpf/test_run.c > which gets built only CONFIG_NET is enabled. Which, this particular > config, disables. > > Alexei, if it's okay with you. I can send a patch that separates the > tracing test code into kernel/bpf/test_run_trace.c which depends > only on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. In such situation we typically add __weak dummy call. May be split will work too. or move tracing_prog_ops to kernel/bpf/core.c ?