From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E190EC433B4 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEA16127C for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233070AbhDTBMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:12:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229994AbhDTBMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:12:41 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349E5C06174A; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z8so41545700ljm.12; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n+jgaG8AKVPYo8O5Zjv+aQxBlQV35EmKPbl4eEMtW/g=; b=UX+87eGTctwV7xwp46787OcZqMe57p1qCFiQDc9TWUP43DluKlp6RzdEVQZupQbW+A lD1eXiK8a6kHrz4X8MKHkdSjxW7F2i0KH3VdD4ZvE9jGWmpKNj4GSBy6JsIbqaRygAks WCcFDrnQMdUpqsd/Z25IP19ziRL1HMxLhYEiP1svtj2vo1OAOMBU4IFR6vsBduV1jR2k MBnmr8zBbcOUJFVSNfgg86MXdq1HcUes0/unzeAaDJzbIsX/xofk0xqhzElhmDBgfS7W bzKgNCVId4GaCeDmBnd9ZtEVDSsRcX0SYnuj5srswpDecCmb/RYKc+Gh5mbeS6YXKHrI RdIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n+jgaG8AKVPYo8O5Zjv+aQxBlQV35EmKPbl4eEMtW/g=; b=XY2xn3YUEGMATTClRtC2W4er1NvrUzbtKPK0zLuFHIry2e/JZBGXwTrVdwyUzSOmC9 LbKN10VVJIZpR44aBCFM0me4miHdpz2ZN/cvPJJ5ZzNr8sq6+Rj4/+JgejlVO6CvBQ2a auRBJoMiN2xw0oVfAugL8tCMduiIi1xuebq0BMEotv4BgQKHAgNf/Uswf/CVFxCG5ezZ FpqdE1fplV7Smq/adKzqDt+WDfIdz0yizZwnkT+6TOhI+vDQijHlbfkOZ1lC2nI8YVJK btZWFekI3Ss8+FV6uJ5sh+ZRoyuc4FC4lv6G2CjoISFzY7eBN7HR6peDUyIU+VLj3HA2 DMjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532799YHXzgdbQRs2ftvu45oBY3p+Ym4ly36GAh52LAOZn46yTi0 WUmMqD/xBJ5U0klpU5ElAEbQXA73i7yL6q6Z0h8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlwl+kqvuT5xwAnYpaWwrr4jbO6sumETaWaf0LOd2EfNnf2PjUqFDlxwzctmkk9b9mmW2DfnJ6OxnKXRb8i28= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f49:: with SMTP id v9mr12852610ljk.44.1618881129736; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:12:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1618399232-17858-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> In-Reply-To: <1618399232-17858-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:11:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Fix some invalid links in bpf_devel_QA.rst To: Tiezhu Yang Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , bpf , LKML , Xuefeng Li Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:20 AM Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > There exist some errors "404 Not Found" when I click the link > of "MAINTAINERS" [1], "samples/bpf/" [2] and "selftests" [3] > in the documentation "HOWTO interact with BPF subsystem" [4]. > > Use correct link of "MAINTAINERS" and just remove the links of > "samples/bpf/" and "selftests" because there are no related > documentations. ... > .. Links > .. _Documentation/process/: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/ > -.. _MAINTAINERS: ../../MAINTAINERS > .. _netdev-FAQ: ../networking/netdev-FAQ.rst > -.. _samples/bpf/: ../../samples/bpf/ > -.. _selftests: ../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ I'm fine with removing maintainers and samples links, but selftests would be good to keep. There is no documentation inside selftests, but clicking to go to source code feels useful. Instead of removing could you make it clickable?