From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A422C433EF for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 23:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232290AbiCUXU5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:20:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59062 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232598AbiCUXUo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:20:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DEB3620E2; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id p5so10654053pfo.5; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZewwJE5XfIuup8vPS+K4oqWDNd0mldqHSrelxp9/gx4=; b=Xceux2tV0MfkN84VgB0qF1jKRpocH8y+vit0oOlRe33Jbi+HIQ7K3GmPrR7s/xmK2V hQ/XIjIYYykhF5aLyqm0qIIE58d4k0W10CbVkcPbIHedCLXcsE5G4qq1O9AcZ4oWHd9E Jul2ckEYElDhkZ+H95GPJ79kGc1+G4wTVamSJdCW9claiodoAw8gxTdfDv8MUY+/ViYo 5bQdrVDdOQA+BYm51yEXwl8ryD0O42U4CNlvH3yiAfibYpCSxG5QDKrqWgxkmXtXguM0 zbXHkXx4GlqVFvQ8f9G0OF9eEh7F9Zfn6YJAFlJId59kFT1dQCrHBFl9QfC4TgPJixbs JZng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZewwJE5XfIuup8vPS+K4oqWDNd0mldqHSrelxp9/gx4=; b=z8Qy9z3AY230SrDxskJTROxePPW1ETXj13OiIt0QzdzO6xla0Ns/iUVxbk9T6U6H6v 0Hsc/sNEsMJBe3qpwCFPIYnSWpA1ZwT6Qct4tVuLEKS6RPVKy5E64vYt3VRItiCG26Bt 9K0SU9Gixq/+Q0vhLny2B3gTUzr3gTZKMRnBESLKunPzkK624XIhPctuPajrDaz72V9o 72nIq3H8cSkU/lV6o3k/Vi9/eHQ3QHBSe0BvuFzC1/4Le4BesKN6Nq5ru/DtPLvipNie vJiKjeDVdTOWrsPZYZS8fLSq3SN7Qb8T2AQDE+5/4Dp/2f/Av9f0stOzr01xQwOVQc57 +Slg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eCefFuNvW0OLEdM/vNin+viznUdXEpvbMFp3MezUp9rLuZ1tD 3IPtuYYQJGuzjXUkndam0FjdH620E9TXN4Qy9RI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOwkUCfaJbCb2f/rGtBuwRCI5/X4xzDNoML42aYW8uAv84DeSqGV479u36yBAqmJ7AMz6GYeKHBP54n3+9l2w= X-Received: by 2002:a62:bd0e:0:b0:4f6:e07f:d4ee with SMTP id a14-20020a62bd0e000000b004f6e07fd4eemr26529286pff.46.1647904290106; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:11:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220321224608.55798-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:11:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2022-03-21 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Miller , Daniel Borkmann , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Jakub Kicinski , Andrii Nakryiko , Stephen Rothwell , Netdev , bpf , Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:02 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 3:46 PM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. > > No > > This is the tree that contains bad architecture code that was NAK'ed > by both x86 and arm64 people respectively. I missed the nacks. Did you look at the code? In particular: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164735286243.1084943.7477055110527046644.stgit@devnote2/ it's a copy paste of arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c How is it "bad architecture code" ? > In particular, I think it's this part: > > > Masami Hiramatsu (11): > > fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs > > rethook: Add a generic return hook > > rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation > > arm64: rethook: Add arm64 rethook implementation > > powerpc: Add rethook support > > ARM: rethook: Add rethook arm implementation > > fprobe: Add exit_handler support > > fprobe: Add sample program for fprobe > > fprobe: Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag for fprobe > > docs: fprobe: Add fprobe description to ftrace-use.rst > > fprobe: Add a selftest for fprobe > > That was added very late to the linux-next tree, and that causes build > warnings because of interactions with other changes. To be fair Masami's set got to v12 revision and was ready before Peter's endbr set. If I didn't miss any email the only known issue is missing endbr annotation.