From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6545CC28CC3 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 03:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9EF20717 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 03:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GcNVRMX5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726603AbfFEDDp (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:03:45 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:35398 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726354AbfFEDDo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:03:44 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a25so17979221lfg.2 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:03:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QMuYTQ6jcAuftn8cOy3+6dxlA2Bt9xvS4jpE5pwbb3Y=; b=GcNVRMX5N4stMkdjXxhD7qejH2dVsIJRh2ewD8ahwS3sif1ngh2+ZkFu4afPHQmZr3 f5NPgoEmEE8zaczMV6ObFWWBCbOkl1h8Rl11I8/a2tG3t3NzggBVtb3V5ugzY5J/ddi9 DsGBY17XMlasXuGLJxas8y2PVItKfHerbVTgta/h+DG9XuFKapkbKZgKd3g9plCjWpZp JKdIPOO7FsTL46j4j4pmT11Qqfz9vLZuvS46jKtpqwsSrjVI0r2CSIBv9U3N0bGe0RbG pYb0ERO3a81+fQAh6Gi6qHMX3dzQ8a0y2p+LfaDGikYwBrt0kXu1/4hU0bI2WyNVrCIR cKvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QMuYTQ6jcAuftn8cOy3+6dxlA2Bt9xvS4jpE5pwbb3Y=; b=foyW2XfpD5fthKqCf/LRfj+Xwh1R43Uy1WYmtyotGvI/uTfz9ZANxaKJzSvrovF0qn SBdb4KjlU+zoI90Hz2LRASlSlGa56PsJZXXrrHRGU6tbtFvEgwBEb5i2G8TGN94VBn+7 OBFNZhYExqyakk4IRHehFg9/7rn8+AerZIwbQo0zAeqpbc5pdc0yXILRSlqLZSYvQQgE TZSzqu/tzGOw4IazuOJAQ5yi2zAYMxVOcYHGndNLEuNK2Dt9GVi8v+GzM4E3CQaoXA00 Iiw1xrEkP/0NXGVnus37ShA2aHvMxJlDwpTQMEBKXQ/xObzSa2kElQ8CjUFI1+wMosIE jy7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7duTLO80z7zVvf4Ysuift8IOyvTqHJNQBGEL5tjSXwo3zIvwq GtN7mpLscK+3hq3TGpIK6ELN84ChLCcSS5L5Oaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxGJTyqnIokRgeRWUx1Pf4odXiULgOB5MILvOcVwLlUHx6YhDhZEeqmuc2abETKpwcdYVET7WpyK0pHlpaQjpQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ab1a:: with SMTP id u26mr10557075lfe.6.1559703823052; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:03:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190604031955.26949-1-dsahern@kernel.org> <20190604.192741.471970699001122583.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20190604.192741.471970699001122583.davem@davemloft.net> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 20:03:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/7] net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}_info To: David Miller Cc: David Ahern , Network Development , Ido Schimmel , Saeed Mahameed , Martin KaFai Lau , Wei Wang , David Ahern Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:28 PM David Miller wrote: > > From: David Ahern > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:19:48 -0700 > > > Set 10 of 11 to improve route scalability via support for nexthops as > > standalone objects for fib entries. > > https://lwn.net/Articles/763950/ > > Series applied, thanks David. imo that was a bad precedent to make. As far as I can see the discussion on a better path forward was still ongoing in v2 thread between David, Martin and Wei. Since the set is already applied it demotivated everyone to review and discuss it further. Please reconsider such decisions in the future.