From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8B844E00CA2; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:25:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.161.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (mail-yw0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E01CE00C9B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d68so37459146ywe.1 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boundarydevices-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=gzNeO4dSkqVEbh4syS1iMrz/N19Obgge70RgPXSRUVs=; b=rIfOOU7aT/rW170ZLXl6mU8zFhCHGFO+/faAAOfsdkao2ABuOCVBQMadsJrSf+vE2M cAcVcFClf6qTEE3+How9bBR6hm2H8/lyOLzfHB65ZHIjT6Mf3NyC7DcXRQfwCn8t/XAv kFxp/mUbO57TRgZdPY37YRqWdAD42eupepo+mU3IoGCf4qKUXy2xMtS32ZSzMtDDwPy6 2WGEmS7TFkQb01fAAAe5+Mh8ZFYv4wpVk5en6lhPMQcUQXoInSzMk460vO6ItFpniKXD NA8mPx5E/gYwwjqi2GifEapJeE4zISFwOVsIs0iNi1CIiNwPcsnMPxZK+XkFMjrKqq1h csiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=gzNeO4dSkqVEbh4syS1iMrz/N19Obgge70RgPXSRUVs=; b=DZbLM7RqOE28ryHDp7gj2zKN1TYEuLtkFTuoKuzsmi44LXIS7QMkKJ75UY/rF6Aip2 oedycAkzInQke1+T5aBSN2F2Go4iXKU3d0ABII3rDRLn2SC+zp0NegZBeXr5UBLZ5Ae1 db7IUDWMWruVSeDwxYvAdsZr97hKtxPFThWWCNKJG/D7kcKmRbsnPo5q5vbWHRQcUx/b L41lq2m+ac21OIbwIcZq8/cvwuWJeTeZ8gzhXV+THD9YKLjp4F1d+zDOHgGAwPwTLJhD F66iLoCY2dkMzJ0xF/P17biDgLYgJEnipYxUm6ki+zVAuZulowlFnQLU/ZD3SknRPlmu j9dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK4LHNfS18/OzuQZiUqLayLIDGXNVSmnl/EYgx3dD/kEeoJVom1PnagcGHxs+g8uvciwhxDBbNhfs5Zlg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.231.78 with SMTP id e75mr11527294ybh.146.1459531533817; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.208.73 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:25:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1459470691-8100-1-git-send-email-tom.hochstein@nxp.com> References: <1459470691-8100-1-git-send-email-tom.hochstein@nxp.com> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:25:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: Gary Bisson To: Tom Hochstein Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 0/4] Upgrade imx-gpu-viv graphics to 5.0.11-p8.3 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 17:25:36 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b11de9d01aa052f6faad8 --94eb2c0b11de9d01aa052f6faad8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Tom, All, On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Tom Hochstein wrote: > - Upgrade imx-gpu-viv graphics to 5.0.11-p8.3 > Shouldn't we upgrade directly to p8.4? Since it fixes 6QP support: https://community.freescale.com/thread/388119 Regards, Gary --94eb2c0b11de9d01aa052f6faad8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, All,

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Tom Hochstein &l= t;tom.hochstein@= nxp.com> wrote:
- Upgrade imx-gpu-viv gra= phics to 5.0.11-p8.3

Shouldn't we u= pgrade directly to p8.4? Since it fixes 6QP support:

Regards,
Gary
=
--94eb2c0b11de9d01aa052f6faad8--