All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY__S2WMO9sUOP4NaObCdvtRNdLNe3VHrE2RbgHBM-gYosw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAk4722oCzcegGdx@ziggy.stardust>

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 下午4:19寫道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> > > > mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  30 +--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c    | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h    |  26 +-
> > > >  5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       {},
> > > >  };
> > > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
> > >
> > > I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
> > > to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
> > > mdp driver. Make sense?
> >
> > Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder
> > device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that
> > follow-up patches.
> >
>
> From my understanding, we will need to keep the of_device_id entries for
> the old binding in the driver (so that old DTs still work) while we
> should enforce the new binding. I'm not sure if the yaml has a option
> for out-of-date compatibles.

OK, I would do it so and remove out-f-date compatibles in yaml at
first to see any feedback.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY__S2WMO9sUOP4NaObCdvtRNdLNe3VHrE2RbgHBM-gYosw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAk4722oCzcegGdx@ziggy.stardust>

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 下午4:19寫道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> > > > mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  30 +--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c    | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h    |  26 +-
> > > >  5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       {},
> > > >  };
> > > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
> > >
> > > I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
> > > to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
> > > mdp driver. Make sense?
> >
> > Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder
> > device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that
> > follow-up patches.
> >
>
> From my understanding, we will need to keep the of_device_id entries for
> the old binding in the driver (so that old DTs still work) while we
> should enforce the new binding. I'm not sure if the yaml has a option
> for out-of-date compatibles.

OK, I would do it so and remove out-f-date compatibles in yaml at
first to see any feedback.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY__S2WMO9sUOP4NaObCdvtRNdLNe3VHrE2RbgHBM-gYosw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAk4722oCzcegGdx@ziggy.stardust>

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 下午4:19寫道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> > > > mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  30 +--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c    | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h    |  26 +-
> > > >  5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       {},
> > > >  };
> > > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
> > >
> > > I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
> > > to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
> > > mdp driver. Make sense?
> >
> > Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder
> > device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that
> > follow-up patches.
> >
>
> From my understanding, we will need to keep the of_device_id entries for
> the old binding in the driver (so that old DTs still work) while we
> should enforce the new binding. I'm not sure if the yaml has a option
> for out-of-date compatibles.

OK, I would do it so and remove out-f-date compatibles in yaml at
first to see any feedback.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:13:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY__S2WMO9sUOP4NaObCdvtRNdLNe3VHrE2RbgHBM-gYosw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAk4722oCzcegGdx@ziggy.stardust>

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 下午4:19寫道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> > > > mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  30 +--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h  |   2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c    | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h    |  26 +-
> > > >  5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > > > -       .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> > > > +       .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > > >       {},
> > > >  };
> > > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
> > >
> > > I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
> > > to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
> > > mdp driver. Make sense?
> >
> > Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder
> > device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that
> > follow-up patches.
> >
>
> From my understanding, we will need to keep the of_device_id entries for
> the old binding in the driver (so that old DTs still work) while we
> should enforce the new binding. I'm not sure if the yaml has a option
> for out-of-date compatibles.

OK, I would do it so and remove out-f-date compatibles in yaml at
first to see any feedback.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-21 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06 23:17 [PATCH v2 0/5] Share mtk mutex driver for both DRM and MDP Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/mediatek: Remove redundant file including Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/mediatek: Rename file mtk_drm_ddp to mtk_mutex Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 18:27   ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 18:27     ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 18:27     ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 23:46     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:46       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:46       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:46       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-21  8:18       ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-21  8:18         ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-21  8:18         ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-21  8:18         ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-21 23:13         ` Chun-Kuang Hu [this message]
2021-01-21 23:13           ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-21 23:13           ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-21 23:13           ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/mediatek: Automatically search unclaimed mtk mutex in mtk_mutex_get() Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] soc / drm: mediatek: Move mtk mutex driver to soc folder Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-06 23:17   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 18:32   ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 18:32     ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 18:32     ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-20 23:43     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:43       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:43       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-20 23:43       ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-19 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Share mtk mutex driver for both DRM and MDP Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-19 23:42   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-19 23:42   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2021-01-19 23:42   ` Chun-Kuang Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAOTY__S2WMO9sUOP4NaObCdvtRNdLNe3VHrE2RbgHBM-gYosw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.