From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE954C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245676AbiBBOKp (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:10:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:27954 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231950AbiBBOKo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:10:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643811044; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=782/lRE3fUhNkZwGYyd0WzZ82QBZ3rM9P2vMEJcLYOI=; b=S90PfLdZKl3r2eTk5xkR89gS3V7SBHnmGt/M8/+LssE8EbOM0sKd4DUAWCa+OA19wDTKcu wrTrWOJv+FzVOPmcaYft40JkNillc8IJwp6z9PbAvaxSMAuJrxSXo72EEksluysqCxMw7A NzFI/I/SURpQaOqJmv0RxqEVYreHrSc= Received: from mail-oo1-f70.google.com (mail-oo1-f70.google.com [209.85.161.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-230-m7-t5ZiyMZ6s_9ijR1vArg-1; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:10:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: m7-t5ZiyMZ6s_9ijR1vArg-1 Received: by mail-oo1-f70.google.com with SMTP id e14-20020a056820060e00b002edda9f237bso8055907oow.22 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=782/lRE3fUhNkZwGYyd0WzZ82QBZ3rM9P2vMEJcLYOI=; b=zDf/JT/VESpeU79Slr723MDuBLD+O8oLTYUof2xcPL4dZ2xk80vg4wNbUsslF38Sx1 HhXaWQms9nWeGJk4o80k9ESWlBXoqocnEogfV0DSjb1tBCVX0EUUWDyrjxr1mfmRZ0k/ N/2kQrEnX7XCQw6iQtFt6oTH6vcAT+wneQNFYGy/4Ng/ldDL2TNgaeN8fJQIy54eIXxc yWn4HAq62NMCIdY0yV6tl/DY+ijAnAXDBfKA2zlHuVNgEm+65CAOQOvPRG7ZZ7FI8MiP 0KFCMDw9EvkflM2dNznlqKLOPAGRGow0FfDcS4XZ/KJVzYWZ0/cwi2OFk4MUxtIu4aMH OBdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iZRekgIFLSmm90qYXwsuqG7dB5RdCIiAu7vbz0x4qnVSO327K 0ppUVCyOdxWD+05qz66hnAHqkZspJeGJjUtsuH3tFm0u/2fnR1UdXJFkaz9VXa8hmFwRtkBOoUw BBj6Hbme9ga6f1LR+dgABuZHah2GES5WBKGlHPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15aa:: with SMTP id t42mr4301014oiw.227.1643811042552; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEJOKTTNDUjrzOHmYM4ezH7OH6gCg5O1InQqQahXj1oYmpelFygsQivjrRRjlHDRik7ihAfQPCXBRBZvgaRj0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15aa:: with SMTP id t42mr4301006oiw.227.1643811042396; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jan Stancek Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Petr Vorel , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara , Ext4 , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > > Thanks! > > > > Guys, > > Looks like we have a regression. agreed, "abort" option stopped working: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945 Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384 This should be new version: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t > With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, > because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. > The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. > > Gabriel, > > Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > instead of the default 5min. > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > Thanks, > Amir. > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A27C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C003C98D0 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2752E3C9732 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8A7200AD7 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643811046; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=782/lRE3fUhNkZwGYyd0WzZ82QBZ3rM9P2vMEJcLYOI=; b=LkhMjC+rFCjChX/5mb+/KW8Zcd4PQpYrAXEL4e0ktdzveoz30DUzzd4taoXLghtyZ82v+f Bqiokestgdm8lnoGzOA28nuQeeMmzvGwKEvIMKepMBobMNr/3fmpLEaUxyWYdXiBWCbYbx q8JmcqxzyPR3n94YAo/Kt8RiYYHKwq0= Received: from mail-ot1-f71.google.com (mail-ot1-f71.google.com [209.85.210.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-643-Aa_y5-nWOiuvVCtkgyuFWw-1; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:10:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Aa_y5-nWOiuvVCtkgyuFWw-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c22-20020a9d6856000000b005a0f193edf0so11047236oto.16 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=782/lRE3fUhNkZwGYyd0WzZ82QBZ3rM9P2vMEJcLYOI=; b=b0XAuoVYR94KAIjoDoZM+lD6J41KO1wq440ROpfI9OPVJ16ONmMlHNXc0YNjfr8Mt9 PsSuDT9B+LRwpIfvsipI+bgPjSPXwhU1IX2K1K5CyCAjY8WavKs7AXkRKcjNfKcTZy0c yY0CPV+7Z4L2hSUvKPU3LXFPiRIO33wJrbZ1VWnTh+Y6+jBxNBnaZTilJPijtSYpqjol 1zyGaIptshIGfc4cSeLTTu1M0taVABMqQWvSH0TURgjEs3CEZxsN2hQg0dS2NltLeF1d YWpwdtGZMK+h7oL7rJYP2mfs3/YM4qMehSwqJ42Un7pVB1U1IbcS6uMdeegw2q8feG5C nFSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x86oPfCY+Y9H4dtELi+r05EE68gcaUqto3wCjTqsZlhUdfLit N5c2osLmFHT2L3FgDRNaudxrdMQZPM1huY/icoykIJ+Z0SscFmPztiVYxTGymVxjedFWfJxAHnP utaq/kf/JP+vPIQk78Wcb5T09Kb4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15aa:: with SMTP id t42mr4301016oiw.227.1643811042553; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEJOKTTNDUjrzOHmYM4ezH7OH6gCg5O1InQqQahXj1oYmpelFygsQivjrRRjlHDRik7ihAfQPCXBRBZvgaRj0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15aa:: with SMTP id t42mr4301006oiw.227.1643811042396; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:10:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jan Stancek Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100 Message-ID: To: Amir Goldstein Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jstancek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ext4 , Matthew Bobrowski , Khazhismel Kumykov , Jan Kara , kernel@collabora.com, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > > Thanks! > > > > Guys, > > Looks like we have a regression. agreed, "abort" option stopped working: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945 Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384 This should be new version: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t > With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, > because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. > The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. > > Gabriel, > > Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > instead of the default 5min. > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > Thanks, > Amir. > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp > -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp