From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: sch: Consolidate similar algorithms Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:08:42 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1421836341-2036-1-git-send-email-rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com> <1421836341-2036-2-git-send-email-rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]:56153 "EHLO mail-ig0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752336AbbAVDJD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:09:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1421836341-2036-2-git-send-email-rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun Cc: Linus Walleij , Mika Westerberg , GPIO Subsystem Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Chang Rebecca Swee Fun wrote: > Consolidating similar algorithms into common functions to make > GPIO SCH simpler and manageable. > > Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun Looks like there has been some confusion due to the adding/removal of patches on Linus' branch. I (as well as Mika IIRC) gave my Reviewed-by on an earlier version of this patch. Has it changed that much that it needs to be reviewed from start again? If you just fixed it to compile on Linus' latest devel branch, you can (and should) carry tags over. Anyway: Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot