From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752389AbdGDHXR (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:23:17 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:32948 "EHLO mail-yb0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752349AbdGDHXP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:23:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170704054839.y2k2yxcjmh6b5jt4@thunk.org> References: <20170629005029.13302-1-tahsin@google.com> <20170629030618.5101-1-tahsin@google.com> <18BC3861-631F-4C45-9043-14E92B3D7922@dilger.ca> <20170704054839.y2k2yxcjmh6b5jt4@thunk.org> From: Tahsin Erdogan Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 00:23:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: have ext4_xattr_set_handle() allocate journal credits To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Tahsin Erdogan , Andreas Dilger , Ext4 Developers List , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Are you aware of other cases where we're likely to run into problems > besides ext4_new_inode()? Nope. If we can get ext4_new_inode() case covered we should be fine. I will abandon this patch and will work on a patch that adds extra credits in __ext4_new_inode(). thanks