From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2022 13:54:09 +0900
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v4 10/13] or1k: ABI lists
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112311744180.2293191@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20211229044251.2203653-1-shorne@gmail.com>
 <20211229044251.2203653-11-shorne@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112311744180.2293191@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Message-ID: <CAAfxs77-NEGg5vCTPxNd7aJmOqvvf1Nf6=Mm8YfrFxJ6GOcDHQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <openrisc.lists.librecores.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022, 2:45 AM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
> >  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/or1k/libnsl.abilist   |  121 +
>
> As noted for the LoongArch port submission, I don't think new ports should
> have libnsl or an ABI test baseline for it.
>

Ok, I'll have a look. Is this something we have to do in new ports or is
this something wrong with the generic parts?

-Stafford

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.librecores.org/pipermail/openrisc/attachments/20220101/046913a0/attachment.htm>