From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Goldschmidt Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:12:17 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: socfpga: stratix10: Remove CONFIG_OF_EMBED In-Reply-To: <1559627882.41120.9.camel@intel.com> References: <20190603235718.28381-1-dalon.westergreen@linux.intel.com> <20190603235718.28381-2-dalon.westergreen@linux.intel.com> <1559627882.41120.9.camel@intel.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:58 AM See, Chin Liang wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 07:13 +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:57 AM Dalon Westergreen > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Dalon Westergreen > > > > > > CONFIG_OF_EMBED was primarily enabled to support the stratix10 > > > spl hex file requirements. Since this option now produces a > > > warning during build, and the spl hex can be created using > > > alternate methods, CONFIG_OF_EMBED is no longer needed. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dalon Westergreen > > > > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > -> Change CONFIG_SPL_TARGET back to u-boot-spl.hex > > > --- > > > configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig | 1 - > > > include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig > > > b/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig > > > index fbab388b43..f27180385d 100644 > > > --- a/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig > > > +++ b/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig > > > @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y > > > CONFIG_CMD_EXT4=y > > > CONFIG_CMD_FAT=y > > > CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC=y > > > -CONFIG_OF_EMBED=y > > > CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="socfpga_stratix10_socdk" > > > CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC=y > > > CONFIG_NET_RANDOM_ETHADDR=y > > > diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h > > > b/include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h > > > index 39d757d737..66855ff0d8 100644 > > > --- a/include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h > > > +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h > > > @@ -210,6 +210,6 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sys_free_clk_hz(void); > > > > > > /* SPL SDMMC boot support */ > > > #define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 1 > > > -#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u- > > > boot.img" > > > +#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot- > > > dtb.img" > > Is that really necessary? I don't have the aarch64 compiler at hand, > > but when compiling a gen5 board, "u-boot.img" and "u-boot-dtb.img" > > are the same. Changing to "u-boot-dtb.img" here only complicates > > things for the user, I think. > > I would agree with Dalon since we want to make sure we use same name as > socfpga_common.h, which is for CV, A10 SoCs. This would help to > standardize our internal test infra. But that 'dtb' thing is an implementation detail. Who of the testers cares whether the devicetree is embedded or not? "u-boot.img" exists with OF_EMBED and without it, or doesn't it? Regards, Simon > > Thanks > Chin Liang > > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > #endif /* __CONFIG_H */ > > > -- > > > 2.21.0 > > >