From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anup@brainfault.org (Anup Patel) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:14:30 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: KVM: Fix coherent_icache_guest_page() for host with external L3-cache. In-Reply-To: <20130830095215.GC62188@MacBook-Pro.local> References: <747a0675165da4ef147bbda4e140549b@www.loen.fr> <5935339137684ecf90dd484cc5739548@www.loen.fr> <20130815165344.GA3853@cbox> <20130816171912.GB20246@cbox> <20130816175034.GE20246@cbox> <20130830095215.GC62188@MacBook-Pro.local> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 07:11:51PM +0100, Anup Patel wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Christoffer Dall >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:12:08PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> >> Discussion here is about getting KVM ARM64 working in-presence >> >> of an external L3-cache (i.e. not part of CPU). Before starting a VCPU >> >> user-space typically loads images to guest RAM so, in-presence of >> >> huge L3-cache (few MBs). When the VCPU starts running some of the >> >> contents guest RAM will be still in L3-cache and VCPU runs with >> >> MMU off (i.e. cacheing off) hence VCPU will bypass L3-cache and >> >> see incorrect contents. To solve this problem we need to flush the >> >> guest RAM contents before they are accessed by first time by VCPU. >> >> >> > ok, I'm with you that far. >> > >> > But is it also not true that we need to decide between: >> > >> > A.1: Flush the entire guest RAM before running the VCPU >> > A.2: Flush the pages as we fault them in >> >> Yes, thats the decision we have to make. >> >> > >> > And (independently): >> > >> > B.1: Use __flush_dcache_range >> > B.2: Use something else + outer cache framework for arm64 >> >> This would be __flush_dcache_all() + outer cache flush all. > > We need to be careful here since the __flush_dcache_all() operation uses > cache maintenance by set/way and these are *local* to a CPU (IOW not > broadcast). Do you have any guarantee that dirty cache lines don't > migrate between CPUs and __flush_dcache_all() wouldn't miss them? > Architecturally we don't, so this is not a safe operation that would > guarantee L1 cache flushing (we probably need to revisit some of the > __flush_dcache_all() calls in KVM, I haven't looked into this). > > So I think we are left to the range operation where the DC ops to PoC > would be enough for your L3. If __flush_dcache_all() is *local" to a CPU then I guess DC ops to PoC by range would be the only option. > > An outer cache flush all is probably only needed for cpuidle/suspend > (the booting part should be handled by the boot loader). Yes, cpuidle/suspend would definitely require outer cache maintenance. For KVM, we can avoid flushing d-cache to PoC every time in coherent_icache_guest_page() by only doing it when Guest MMU is turned-off. This may reduce the performance penalty. > > -- > Catalin --Anup