From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huacai Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:12:13 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1426213595-28454-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:33432 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbbCYDMO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:12:14 -0400 Received: by wixw10 with SMTP id w10so64605693wix.0 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:12:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Ralf Baechle , "Steven J. Hill" , linux-mips , Fuxin Zhang , Zhangjin Wu , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" It seems Ralf is very very busy, I have some bugfixing patches queued for a long time and no response. Maybe Steven can give a ACK for this? Huacai On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Huacai Chen wrote: >> I think these three patches can go to GPIO tree, because it has no >> relationship with others in this series. > > In that case we would need a ack from the MIPS maintainers to move the > code into drivers/gpio/. > >> >> Huacai >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Huacai Chen wrote: >>>> This cleanup is prepare to move the driver to drivers/gpio. Custom >>>> definitions of gpio_get_value()/gpio_set_value() are dropped. >>> >>> I suppose this is starting to look ok, at least patches 3, 4 and 5 >>> which are of interest for GPIO. I wonder which tree they should be >>> merged through, MIPS or GPIO? Not seeing the rest of the series, I >>> cannot make a suggestion. >>> >