From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 74B4DE00CD5; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 23:04:58 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (maillinglists18[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.167.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4FBE00C93 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 23:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id b20so2116013lfa.12 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 23:04:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WEkUQITGeWVvhAM5nIB5uJt6UVArbKQUObhTgdjxnvU=; b=sS5PLlrHAV3n/k2GUw9AYHmqwAuLrvF2EikezoE340rVjAczLk11Le5z4kl9PQfIUT sUoxGW5yPuB1nu9jCVNkl72yRsd5ZyIapfwNwCgUWZxns2PZtWhaYcsYLH1sIcKGNNz/ FP+38XRDtGN7oJqI3ydBXG/EZL0PHW4IgXNIQZFsahQfog2RVWA51GS/dwFLo4qbPfGF Lw3DRkC1wMMfNk9RBjZ5ez6kiB8uVTLze1iN+M+uhGg8fligTOWMGP502cnJWIqtcneG 67YNJgDNjORP+H/UQkNOzR/TlR8LSy/y4EpbnbfEPvxtuiLKUzMar6RE/oXvLEDs/uou UHtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WEkUQITGeWVvhAM5nIB5uJt6UVArbKQUObhTgdjxnvU=; b=EkU+AzemzWjfJkbSojvtBQu2qt9WIF9k3bQ42D+mk1MrzUE7IkWq1ssnlUAF8MN9qb MPej0Frw0jTIYVB7dJ+oXNZEHJ82JwEfdnE/y8lNRe6tRx+TFlpYUGP3mBAs2Ds03xrf 2iA2+Mi5FCSP+i/YEzqjcZ8/M0ypddAC3OmQmVFORXn27xdx5e3yjdztJKBS0BdrXG7S NxeIeY5jLs6ctzkNq8cFAYvOyBTHW8RPs73tQKB4KT6kCb3BG3sxySWdkpb4OfgM4MSI ALQtQBV2F3dxcpCNVKIG4mWLQe9EQ8oRmYHYPZ0SLlGz/omYORCYRKOxiaBeNsdIUmte SdOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfTK50nG17aYx688F0AogMKiYr/G4hDQHjd64DFVq/s/rreGKu2 SsCHqFlwT9z4ObT8yA6Fa02ToIxnlkMp7DjzUzH+jhMp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7qqlBYsAyBD3qfNvqzXxv7fXbjtMxY6SJH1KRYwLKrIQGT2ko8+V7vCqb+JclEFhoLPJW69ObVs5T9na123k8= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4ace:: with SMTP id x197mr322593lfa.39.1546931096135; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 23:04:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Teemu K Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Status of i.MX8 support X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 07:04:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, What is the state of the meta-freescale i.MX8 support? I'm trying to compile image for NXP i.MX8 development board (MCIMX8QXP - CPU). I'm using thud - branch of everything, but while compiling and using kernel linux-imx_4.9.123 (that's the only one with i.MX8 support as far as I can tell based on recipes) the kernel fails to build properly. I think it's more of the kernel modules that create some bitbake related errors. -- ERROR: linux-imx-4.9.123-r0 do_package_write_deb: Fatal errors occurred in subprocesses: dpkg-deb -b /home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/hv/build/tmp/work/imx8qxpmek-poky-linux/linux-imx/4.9.123-r0/packages-split/kernel-module-snd-usb-audio-4.9.123-imx_4.9.123_imx8mm_ga+g6a71cbc /home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/hv/build/tmp/work/imx8qxpmek-poky-linux/linux-imx/4.9.123-r0/deploy-debs/imx8qxpmek' returned non-zero exit status 2: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/common/../../poky/../poky/meta/lib/oe/utils.py", line 272, in run ret = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) File "/home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/common/../../poky/../poky/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass", line 274, in deb_write_pkg shell=True) File "/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 626, in check_output **kwargs).stdout File "/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 708, in run output=stdout, stderr=stderr) -- I cut that some and there are more of similar errors coming. If I remove those modules from kernel I'll get error on some other module. Just wondering if that should work? I know it's quite new and may have some problems so if it's known not to work then I guess I'll do something else. -TeemuK