From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4477BE00C5F; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 00:29:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (maillinglists18[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.208.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-lj1-f175.google.com (mail-lj1-f175.google.com [209.85.208.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856A4E00BED for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 00:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f175.google.com with SMTP id c19-v6so5729982lja.5 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:29:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cnpQPF7oOviRZNH5jY67baK4LkwBefmGUJaQ63sx0Vo=; b=flE+DEIAjD6YN+ZFXGRiQo+OcVrw/QEC9+KVjF2qZQFHdQdhquQL8ohwHRaGxqPSlL 4oe6Dd+U5Cto9pAXX3mb2VRZEEk1bGcbhikt02Wh29t2WiUwQesmEbOpMe+od/DRa8rB nAA860Vn6mqUqVd8p1BLZ42jvQ5r5zO0wCNQO/AUxLG+mP2PMAtwgzqDKytU29tfephV 77iK1/3UzWr1MINdymOSDPPrWQ8ndpK1jbYkYtPral0s7UHx4wZED4kseYZtcA6X4Qna M0Gnk7f1Z2CtWMqFgFWY1zx0RdzdLX5oNdlL4lo/dysn/GNegU0HVM2HFe42jP1rGAS+ Z3UA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=cnpQPF7oOviRZNH5jY67baK4LkwBefmGUJaQ63sx0Vo=; b=PsI2HD8ZzTAEayH6OXghjcVKHEZK1IEtEXZfFJfEauHTjvtvA0zJWyCsK57eAoWesi wQSJYYcNKdEtSlHkSikNXml1rJoCwXGqL/wrP1i4WDq6auWybrhY5lfvG+D3BeNDimu1 Cd/8C1taQW4VYswzjiNgvqf4vxNZGQS3TW/ouD1iKooEE2hwZhKD1zShVwj0YeGUQUz+ SI8n7/BZA7O7g5FAXNfj0gm3ONQ1mWbmzKeYvqup6/VETWiSEjhbGwSVwjjrlkw8ay9D 592ex5X/Xeh++NkszMuob4WwyRE5Ld0EmRaMZs5yESx5Mu1rSCLfr9+dL+nJeSpmf8z0 1UbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukervqefGQd3Z54sFc0GgyiZh1N2KJU2ufrmW/xIKG9LTISedyLz xqjYfC140+FwoTIYMM4e8sGI3jTbRwqQZipfO6ieyldm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4zxDgEl5KWjHmk8MLbatGZSWSdeFOuvVOevcVj+rcGnCPgRk1CqfG61wGgvEc/JUwatCkSZVjtkM/oCJsw69o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:83d7:: with SMTP id s23-v6mr3236555ljh.139.1547022571047; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:29:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Teemu K Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:29:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Status of i.MX8 support X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:29:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:04 AM Teemu K wrote: > > Hi, > > What is the state of the meta-freescale i.MX8 support? I'm trying to > compile image for NXP i.MX8 development board (MCIMX8QXP - CPU). > > I'm using thud - branch of everything, but while compiling and using > kernel linux-imx_4.9.123 (that's the only one with i.MX8 support as > far as I can tell based on recipes) the kernel fails to build > properly. I think it's more of the kernel modules that create some > bitbake related errors. > > -- > ERROR: linux-imx-4.9.123-r0 do_package_write_deb: Fatal errors > occurred in subprocesses: > dpkg-deb -b /home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/hv/build/tmp/work/imx8qxpmek-poky-linux/linux-imx/4.9.123-r0/packages-split/kernel-module-snd-usb-audio-4.9.123-imx_4.9.123_imx8mm_ga+g6a71cbc > /home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/hv/build/tmp/work/imx8qxpmek-poky-linux/linux-imx/4.9.123-r0/deploy-debs/imx8qxpmek' > returned non-zero exit status 2: Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/common/../../poky/../poky/meta/lib/oe/utils.py", > line 272, in run > ret = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) > File "/home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/common/../../poky/../poky/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass", > line 274, in deb_write_pkg > shell=True) > File "/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 626, in check_output > **kwargs).stdout > File "/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 708, in run > output=stdout, stderr=stderr) > -- > > I cut that some and there are more of similar errors coming. If I > remove those modules from kernel I'll get error on some other module. > > Just wondering if that should work? I know it's quite new and may have > some problems so if it's known not to work then I guess I'll do > something else. > > -TeemuK I did some digging and it seems that the dpkg-deb - command, fails to this error when run manually: dpkg-deb: error: failed to open package info file '/home/teemu/proj/imx8dev/src/platform/hv/build/tmp/work/imx8qxpmek-poky-linux/linux-imx/4.9.123-r0/packages-split/kernel-module-snd-hwdep-4.9.123-imx_4.9.123_imx8mm_ga+g6a71cbc/DEBIAN/control' for reading: No such file or directory How has anyone else managed to build Yocto image for i.MX8? Or has anyone done that? -Teemu