[lustre-devel] (no subject)

[Amir Shehata <amir.shehata.whamcloud@gmail.com>]

lnetctl was designed to control LNet only. We have not moved the rest of
the lctl functionality. lctl does a lot of other lustre specific functions.

The idea was to have lnetctl be only LNet specific, and lctl lustre
specific. In essence we are attempting to decouple LNet from lustre. There
has been some talk about upstreaming LNet before lustre with all the work
that James Simmons from ORNL is doing.

thanks
amir

On 10 January 2017 at 14:06, Christopher J. Morrone <morrone2@llnl.gov>
wrote:

> Sounds good to me.  Ideally, lnetctl should be able to do everything
> that lctl could do (plus all of the new features).  Has it reached
> parity?  If not, what else still remains to be done?
>
> Chris
>
> On 01/10/2017 12:15 PM, Amir Shehata wrote:
> > lctl usage is kept for backwards compatibility. Eventually, we should be
> > moving to using lnetctl exclusively. Which lustre-release we should do
> > that in, is the question. 2.10?
> >
> > thanks
> > amir
> >
> > On 4 January 2017 at 16:16, Di Natale, Giuseppe <dinatale2@llnl.gov
> > <mailto:dinatale2@llnl.gov>> wrote:
> >
> >     Greetings,
> >
> >     I am attempting to port the SysV lnet script as part of a transition
> >     to systemd. I ran into the following in lustre/scripts/lnet:
> >
> >             if [ -x $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY -a -f
> >     "$LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_FILE" ]; then
> >                     $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY lnet configure || exit 1
> >             else
> >                     lctl network up || exit 1
> >             fi
> >
> >     Can the check for LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY  (/usr/sbin/lnetctl by
> >     default) be removed so that way lnetctl is used exclusively?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Giuseppe Di Natale
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     lustre-devel mailing list
> >     lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
> >     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
> >     <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lustre-devel mailing list
> > lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20170110/358aa93b/attachment.htm>