From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [ [PATCH v2] 01/13] virtio: Introduce config
	RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:16:36 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAyOgsZBpkPb=_-77814q_U9MbOBQ==S3SAUp-ScAqMxV=R3fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1450098032-21198-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <CAAyOgsbAyU1VhPCbZ4FjMwkk8OYs8gORP=+rXbmNQOxCX2mvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.220.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0878D3A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:46:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wq6so60289773pac.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530
> Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>> > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for sse/avx
>> > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does not
>> > exist(todo).
>> >
>> > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64.  By making
>> > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will work
>> > in non-vectored virtio mode.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>> any review  / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks
>
> The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect
> and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this
> low level SSE bit twiddling.
>

I little confused - do we care for this patch?