From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shukla Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] virtio: arm/arm64: memory mapped IO support in pmd driver Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:23:54 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1449250519-28372-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1449250519-28372-7-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <20151207090833.03f65d63@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Rizwan Ansari To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B823195 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:53:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so11896741pac.2 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 04:53:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151207090833.03f65d63@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger < stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:05:19 +0530 > Santosh Shukla wrote: > > > > > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP > > +/* start address of first pci_iobar slot (user-space virtual-addres) */ > > +void *ioport_map; > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) > > + > > +#include > > +#define DEV_NAME "/dev/igb_ioport" > > + > > +/* Keeping pci_ioport_size = 4k. > > + * So maximum mmaped pci_iobar supported = > > + * (ioport_size/pci_dev->mem_resource[0].len) > > + * > > + * note: kernel could allow maximum 32 virtio-net-pci interface, that > mean > > + * maximum 32 PCI_IOBAR(s) where each PCI_IOBAR_LEN=0x20, so > virtio_map_ioport() > > + * func by theory gonna support 4k/0x20 ==> 128 PCI_IOBAR(s), more than > > + * max-virtio-net-pci interface. > > + */ > > +#define PAGE_SIZE 4096 > > +#define PCI_IOPORT_SIZE PAGE_SIZE > > +#define PCI_IOPORT_MAX 128 /* 4k / 0x20 */ > > + > > +int ioport_map_cnt; > > +#endif /* ARM, ARM64 */ > > +#endif /* RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP */ > > These variables should be static. > > (Sorry for delayed follow, Was travelling..) Right, > Also, it is should be possible to extract the I/O bar stuff in a generic > way through sysfs > and not depend on a character device. The long term goal for DPDK > acceptance is to > eliminate (or at least reduce to a minumum) any requirement for special > kernel drivers. > I agree. Existing implementation does read pci_iobar for start address and size, But for non-x86 arch, we need someway to map pci_iobar and thats-why thought of adding device file for a purpose, as archs like arm lack iopl() privileged io syscall support, However iopl() too quite native driver design assumption. I have few idea in my mind such that - Right now I am updating ioport_mapped addr {kernel-virtual-addr-io-memory} to /sys/bus/pci/pci_bus_xxxx/xxx/map field, instead of mapping their, I'll try to map to uio's pci interface and then use existing pci_map_resource() api to mmap kernel-virtual-io-address to user-space-virtual-ioaddr. We'll come back on this.