On Apr 23, 2012 12:41 AM, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On 21.04.12 at 02:58, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@virtuata.com>
wrote:
> > Add GS base to the HVM VCPU context returned by xc_vcpu_getcontext()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@virtuata.com>
> >
> > diff -r e62ab14d44af -r babbb3e0f4d3 xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c   Fri Apr 20 11:36:02 2012 -0700
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c   Fri Apr 20 17:55:49 2012 -0700
> > @@ -1592,6 +1592,12 @@ void arch_get_info_guest(struct vcpu *v,
> >          c.nat->user_regs.fs = sreg.sel;
> >          hvm_get_segment_register(v, x86_seg_gs, &sreg);
> >          c.nat->user_regs.gs = sreg.sel;
> > +#ifdef __x86_64__
> > +        if ( ring_0(&c.nat->user_regs) )
> > +            c.nat->gs_base_kernel = sreg.base;
> > +        else
> > +            c.nat->gs_base_user = sreg.base;
> > +#endif
>
> If you do anything like this, do it completely please (i.e. fill all three
> base address fields instead of just one).
>

Sure. I was not sure if it was ok to add fields to the vcpu context
structure which is why I didn't do it across the board. I will do so and
resubmit.

Aravindh
> Jan
>
> >      }
> >      else
> >      {
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>
>