From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0736088645653047311=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Harris, James R <james.r.harris at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [SPDK] RFC patch for NVMe-OF FC transport
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:23:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CAB29699-CA54-4FAE-A86F-0C6FB4FBACAF@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: CAH1atHQ7y2z9_WpbuR5NSHFsYc7DjJaNkO=rvFMDi3Jj88Jbwg@mail.gmail.com
List-ID: <spdk@lists.01.org>
To: spdk@lists.01.org

--===============0736088645653047311==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi John,

Thanks!

One thing I'm not seeing yet is how NVMe FC will be tested within the autom=
ated SPDK CI system.  I would expect test systems in place which would run =
FC functional tests on each SPDK patch and report results into GerritHub.  =
The tests that these systems are running should also be checked into the ma=
in SPDK repository and plumbed into the autotest.sh framework.

Does Broadcom have plans to add these tests and test systems?

Regards,

-Jim


=EF=BB=BFOn 11/16/18, 3:40 PM, "SPDK on behalf of John Barnard" <spdk-bounc=
es(a)lists.01.org on behalf of john.barnard(a)broadcom.com> wrote:

    Hi Ben, Jim, et. al.
    =

    I have pushed a patch for review (
    https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/433685) containing the update=
s to
    add support for Fibre Channel in the  SPDK target NVME-OF transport.
    Please review and comment.  Once we agree on it, I will push a merge pa=
tch.
    =

    Thanks,
    John
    _______________________________________________
    SPDK mailing list
    SPDK(a)lists.01.org
    https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk
    =



--===============0736088645653047311==--