From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895917E for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id p187so3846563iod.8 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:13:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SsgrpeTLa20B/fYTb4j8NXUplBDhdJdZijNFiaoxNOU=; b=C5MCOoK4Uq7sjKLsczND8qdEdB1cLM9E0P7h/JZxkiSycCLBsT6GnX6FDokn2/3Cn+ qG8zF6IYsTY9FVeJB1X1yVRHM1yJa0Vy6OtwM1fb6YT2gHXgmUL+J33vID404+GxZUVO O7V2MdUQLs7lNq6X3q3OdAazDO1oe9eUTaS9VxsuyFgPoq7G17JCLEsVF9X1rW5n848T 7HoYdhN5fi13/XrSFzbKE6m9V95vnA+ChP9Wc5NMj+bJm58Y9tvDiEQLp+80YDtosVlP n9ljWlxKwplYhpwLDnXLOMbj3/TvxKJfwUkmp6czGT1R5z1g03nevnvZAIy3RD2bpxX8 ruMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=SsgrpeTLa20B/fYTb4j8NXUplBDhdJdZijNFiaoxNOU=; b=jAikCcZ/xBSNLNsfD7hAW1eu0gJdeYMpH5PDxMtHjBwNzmSlIHqc5WDNprj4YP8I8p cYxsi/miPgGZSB+KqSBVNQTSWGz3u2Xz2GKyQy9zmkY1QqBM5RiEEsQ52pgsKm9Bl8/8 GWJz1sB2qWHlTGCa2EykyjURhGKnDAk2YnEp2gQPitqANPI1Ma6RCRfaPph5Ke5SZ6WO bEsXGYOCIxsHZOy2fc9AmmNe6g66B4DjzqlJh5QIA0b1BdCzg6MmxU/C/cUld8V8quw6 FXLEqIIkEnCtGVCjmSz8KOaiZlt+fyaoVDjZHYFOD78TYvvoFTEyNK2eyZTVxFtox+t8 04pQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3zR6AYqwsfVRk1IU8b0Cr53ELvJzvkfuIpMWStd8uMtieRcW9u ogt7zMT+FyNwf5iDDF2ADDVgPhXylryoliccqaE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6/6VG+ThLC/u+8Sx3MwVU84dICkhsDMBT1EnTrT5nz8IHtZMz3lMKQSrIWubZNVSeyOblK7rVEXUXb3FtokNA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:160b:b0:346:ab00:9c7c with SMTP id x11-20020a056638160b00b00346ab009c7cmr21670772jas.241.1662218019547; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6026b5e2-a8f5-1058-6112-f191bde333a6@my.mail.de> <47e41e8f-f6b2-4bc7-de3f-0c811ee6fdf7@my.mail.de> <62fb8a16-bebd-5de7-0b4f-eed4d2593587@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <62fb8a16-bebd-5de7-0b4f-eed4d2593587@roeck-us.net> From: Eugene Shalygin Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 17:13:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issue in asus_ec_sensors in Fedora installations and other distributions To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Christopher Klooz , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guenter, yes, there is a patch that I don't really understand, but it fixes a very similar problem: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216412 I will test today that change with a hardware where it needs to autoload and submit the patch if it works. Best regards, Eugene On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 17:09, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 9/3/22 04:00, Christopher Klooz wrote: > > Hi Eugene, > > > > Currently, we have user reports of at least 4 Fedora installations that= have issues with asus_ec_sensors since 5.19.4. They remain in 5.19.6. > > > > All issues can be solved by blacklisting asus_ec_sensors. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2121844 > > > > The bugzilla report contains kernel logs of two machines, one with nvid= ia-driver and one without a tainted kernel. > > > > The report and the contained ask.fedora link contain some elaborations = of how the issue manifests at the users' machines. The major issue is a wro= ng output of battery power percentage (in one case it gets stuck, in the ot= her cases is becomes erratic). Also, in one case it has effects on suspendi= ng (see the report). > > > > On the Internet, there are already reports from other Linux distributio= ns noting the issue and the same solution (blacklisting). > > > > Eugene, > > do you have an immediate idea other than reverting the patch pointed to i= n the bug report ? > > Thanks, > Guenter >