From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:40469 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935970Ab3DJUM2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:12:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m15so938656wgh.27 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:12:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1365601666.4235.18.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1365593728-5720-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1365593728-5720-17-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1365601666.4235.18.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:12:05 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130410_221232_071242_BC270019) Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] backports: add udev rules if required for backported firmware_class To: Johannes Berg Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Oh, I wonder if there's a way to know this isn't needed on newer > kernels? But I guess it doesn't really hurt anyway. Its where we left off on compat-drivers so I welcome evolutions :) Luis