From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1405986034-29122-1-git-send-email-armansito@chromium.org> <20140722085507.GA29664@t440s.lan> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:24:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/1] doc/gatt-api: New API properties and methods for the GATT D-Bus API. From: Marcin Kraglak To: Arman Uguray Cc: BlueZ development , Johan Hedberg , chao.jie.gu@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Arman, On 22 July 2014 22:40, Arman Uguray wrote: > Hi Chaojie, Johan, > > Please see my responses inline: > > >>> + array{object} Characteristics [read-only] >>> + >>> + Array of object paths representing the characteristics >>> + of this service. This property is set only when the >>> + characteristic discovery has been completed, however the >>> + characteristic objects will become available via >>> + ObjectManager as soon as they get discovered. >> For this new property, I think there is not essential as other property, >> because when characteristic discovery happen , all the object path will setup >> on DBus Hierarchy. And user can get all the characteristic by ObjectManger. > > The problem is that ObjectManager has no clear way to tell a client > that "this subset of object paths have been published" and when they > are all available via GetManagedObjects. The most a client can do is > observe the InterfacesAdded signal and that signal is sent on a per > object path basis. For most external applications, it might be enough > but I would like application APIs to have to ability to say "all > objects published, service is ready to use". > > >> Through this, User can use their own structure to get this array of object. >> That is also why we need object property such as Device, Service and so on. >> >> And another reason , it have to wait for characteristic discovery completed, it >> also can say that it have to wait for characteristic setup DBus Hirarchy is >> ready. There exists asynchronous issues, if user get this property operation >> before all the characteristic DBus setup is ready, it will make a mistake. >> > > This is exactly the problem. A simple update of this property lets the > user know that the hierarchy has been set up. For all I care, this > could even be a simple boolean property such as "DiscoveryComplete" > but I kind of like the list of characteristics even though > GetManagedObjects/InterfacesAdded, as you say, can achieve the same > result. We have the similar "Includes" property already, so it's not > entirely inconsistent from an API standpoint. > > >>> + void StartNotify() >>> + >>> + Starts a notification session from this characteristic >>> + if it supports value notifications or indications. >>> + >>> + Possible Errors: org.bluez.Error.Failed >>> + org.bluez.Error.InProgress >>> + org.bluez.Error.NotSupported >> About this method , I think other LE profile offer similar interface to user, >> such as in heartrate profile. It will give registerwatcher method, in which >> it will enable notify for heartrate. This will help to trace descriptor >> including notification bit changed and send Propertychanged signal. > > Are you referring to the HeartRateManager1 hierarchy? Since we're now > building a generic API, we need a proper way of reference-counted, > per-connection way to access the Client Characteristic Configuration > descriptor. In this proposal, calling WriteValue on the CCC descriptor > will always fail with WriteNotPermitted. > > Do you have any suggestions for the method name or are you OK with > StartNotify for now? We can always change it later. > > >> "Insufficient Authorization" seems different from the other two in that >> it's something that can't be attempted to be "fixed" from the client >> side. It effectively means that our request was rejected by the remote >> user, doesn't it? > > Good point, there is really not much bluetoothd or the external app > can do in this case so we should probably propagate the authentication > error separately from the NotPaired cases. Or do you think that it > would be beneficial to have separate error definitions for Encryption > and Authentication as well? Having Error.NotPaired and > Error.Authentication seems reasonable to me. Error.Authorization seems to be higher layer specific: "The authorization requirements for access to a given attribute are not defined in this specification. Each device implemen- tation will determine how authorization occurs. Authorization procedures are defined in GAP, and may be further refined in a higher layer specification." so it seems reasonable to send this error to application. We could also add Invalid Value Length error. > > Cheers, > Arman > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html BR Marcin