From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Amit Tomer <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:58:49 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/21] arm: dts: Use consistent name "CLK_ETHERNET" for
 the Ethernet clock binding
In-Reply-To: <20200224143722.60d66352@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1579954983-11329-1-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
 <1579954983-11329-10-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
 <20200223173825.GI20386@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
 <20200224143722.60d66352@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <CABHD4K-U2eNssOrAf+_ysBq_Axj93Zwsk0ocnHn2zYniFT_p+Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

> So either you send this patch to the kernel first, or, probably better, you drop this change here, and unify the name at the point where it's used (#ifndef CLK_ETHERNET ....)

But this is something mentioned in cover letter:

"Patch(9/21) uses same name for ethernet clock binding and if it's ok,
would like to send it to LKML
as well."

anyways as suggested by Mani to drop Ethernet related patches for now,
this patch is not necessary in that case.
Meanwhile, would send it to LKML first for a review.

Thanks
-Amit