From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zhouyangchao Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bnx2x: reserve enough headroom for mbuf prepend Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 05:57:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6fd6d52e-a756-45ad-9666-60fa7ca676cd@zyc-PC.local> <4a1a34a8-87a9-5776-dfeb-1be4fe59eb12@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, harish.patil@cavium.com, rasesh.mody@cavium.com To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com (mail-io0-f196.google.com [209.85.223.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274914CA6 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 06:57:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id e7so5785129ioj.1 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:57:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4a1a34a8-87a9-5776-dfeb-1be4fe59eb12@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m->data_off should be reset to its default value (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), instead of reusing the previous undefined value, which could cause the packet to have a too small or too high headroom. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/6/2018 11:21 AM, zhouyangchao wrote: > > Can you please provide more information why this patch is needed? > > > Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou > > --- > > drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c > b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c > > index a0d4ac9..d8a3225 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c > > @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ bnx2x_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > rxq->sw_ring[idx] = mbuf; > > - rxq->rx_ring[idx] = mbuf->buf_iova; > > + rxq->rx_ring[idx] = > > + rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_data_iova_default(mbuf)); > > } > > rxq->pkt_first_seg = NULL; > > rxq->pkt_last_seg = NULL; > > @@ -400,7 +401,8 @@ bnx2x_recv_pkts(void *p_rxq, struct rte_mbuf > **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) > > > > rx_mb = rxq->sw_ring[bd_cons]; > > rxq->sw_ring[bd_cons] = new_mb; > > - rxq->rx_ring[bd_prod] = new_mb->buf_iova; > > + rxq->rx_ring[bd_prod] = > > + > rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_data_iova_default(new_mb)); > > > > rx_pref = NEXT_RX_BD(bd_cons) & MAX_RX_BD(rxq); > > rte_prefetch0(rxq->sw_ring[rx_pref]); > > @@ -409,7 +411,7 @@ bnx2x_recv_pkts(void *p_rxq, struct rte_mbuf > **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) > > rte_prefetch0(&rxq->sw_ring[rx_pref]); > > } > > > > - rx_mb->data_off = pad; > > + rx_mb->data_off = pad + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM; > > rx_mb->nb_segs = 1; > > rx_mb->next = NULL; > > rx_mb->pkt_len = rx_mb->data_len = len; > > > >