From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHoiJ-0004Vz-La for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:22:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHoiI-00070M-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:22:03 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::244]:33581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHoiI-0006xG-IY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:22:02 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p13so11298957ioi.0 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 01:22:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161216090024.GA4434@noname.redhat.com> References: <20161214142518.10504-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20161215063226-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161215075028.GD26169@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <1481793479.21413.6.camel@redhat.com> <20161215170523-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1481819150.21413.21.camel@redhat.com> <20161215202505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161215211838-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161216090024.GA4434@noname.redhat.com> From: Howard Spoelstra Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:21:59 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] regression in 2.8: unable to exit screen grab in SDL mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Thomas Huth , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , Cole Robinson On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.12.2016 um 09:26 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: >> On 15.12.2016 20:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:15:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 05:25:50PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> >>>> Do we fix this or disable SDL altogether? >> >>> >> >>> Well, it can't be *that* bad, otherwise it would not went unnoticed for >> >>> a whole release cycle. >> >> >> >> That's what I'm saying, maybe no one uses SDL anymore. >> >> It's maybe not as common as the GTK interface, but as far as I know >> people still use the SDL interface. For example here: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/922076 >> >> ... so I would recommend to keep the SDL code in QEMU. > > When I actualy use qemu rather than just doing a quick test, I generally > prefer SDL, too, because the GTK frontend still grabs some keys like F10 > for itself instead of passing them to the guest. And using HMP for > something as simple as that - no, thanks. > > Kevin > I'd like to also point to the recent status report by Stefan Weil concerning UI support in Windows builds: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-12/msg01383.html At least for PPC Mac OS/OSX guests only the SDL1.2 UI is somewhat usable, GTK2/3, SDL2 and VNC are all problematic. Best, Howard