From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Saint-Jacques Subject: Re: [patch] socket.7: Document SO_INCOMING_CPU Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <63815aac-9c8f-c599-9422-5c312cefc9e8@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]:36621 "EHLO mail-qt0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753010AbdBTP0I (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:26:08 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k15so89375986qtg.3 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 07:26:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <63815aac-9c8f-c599-9422-5c312cefc9e8@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Because all of the packets for a single stream (i.e., all > packets for the same 4-tuple) arrive on the single RX queue This is a configuration dependent behaviour and not always the default. Maybe put a reference to `ethtool(8)` for more information instead of possibly misleading the user? Fran=C3=A7ois