From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B42C48BC2 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9E46120D for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229958AbhFWGuP (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 02:50:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39480 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229916AbhFWGuO (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 02:50:14 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF25AC061574 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id h9so2232314oih.4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:47:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HOd/2PWJy2r7P9ZMCDXQK3c+Y+z1ot9PJy908G49V3k=; b=E/mOMywK3f4gfrbDBYVrfTQH7vA3LWmK2R2D1cT0l9eu3z4xyaVmZQiIEZ/E6g54Zx 1kjoxto/zouzAa3eSKv6e3tnB3YSUPIBM9Rfik+OqzbUAz3e9i+frPOCO+LVzHbY1FNB ZZyLcKtq8d1i+1Y/MN1V4hYEJOC4spSy2ujbL93V+xy/tONmMJ5+ajBBKn8f2j6+ruVz C6RxvIH0qkII1PTjxCoQkA6L6rYM0Uvv8SCblO1xzS2cYir7nKe1ZMonLLpfy4NCENwc tl/0OV9o/h1cnSgtBhR325DJvGZo5NHtkLm63fuE+DsXx4ZGMVMDCFIV1SwqKV3YBxfK w3Xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HOd/2PWJy2r7P9ZMCDXQK3c+Y+z1ot9PJy908G49V3k=; b=gPms0MLsmsKSCc8KB98nkqUleUmjo37lFGLP2VlUQsKWQk37CGjY0m6i619atnAu2T ZKXFspDQL+fzgiVM5WJKoo2yB9dPQeXqPJPXWvxQaOwPVHzIoEUp8fN8f5w7fLz0KGSR 5pLAMTey5VcBgE5qpKnSiO0GNvkTfGNmIsHtACDdFzPktGZjWA736OkenpB3eQ+6v9xd HAqpeBad/3kPL8nZVRA6I8FOtRxTCBdTFFC7cq3/m9GYfnfKkhXNhd/av3fNwDtWVJ9B EcLhVcoKykyKiAKFcD/2ElCIj4uv4NL7iAWFH1BvRCCF9GdU1v6oO7U3vJiBzS5/ZRHp H/1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T0uuuxjgJmKM7Mf4Vhx/yljn39M6oirCBThrcRWhTapUaRRF9 wOl80H/LLGjrysh7G1hUmW9bmjKu58IXPvzQkU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwD5Vm+EsOpx7iKrPIXhnzvhsAC0yMrczELeMKRrS58G5oq7eJu/mywuHEGgCCPsnyftFSRJA/t9Tb2cLIGW9M= X-Received: by 2002:aca:f482:: with SMTP id s124mr2015091oih.167.1624430877250; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:47:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210621175234.1079004-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20210621175234.1079004-3-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <60d0df99d91e1_108e902085e@natae.notmuch> <60d10ebd99d86_113139208cd@natae.notmuch> <60d2b5ffc23af_1b53208aa@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <60d2b5ffc23af_1b53208aa@natae.notmuch> From: Elijah Newren Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:47:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pull: improve default warning To: Felipe Contreras Cc: Alex Henrie , Git mailing list , =?UTF-8?B?VsOtdCBPbmRydWNo?= , Jacob Keller , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:18 PM Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Elijah Newren wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:22 PM Alex Henrie wrote: > > > .... > > > Thanks for the link, and sorry for not having followed this > > > conversation closely enough to have seen your previous replies. While > > > > No worries, you were trying to be a good citizen by reviewing patches, > > and the patches didn't come with links to the old threads > > That's not true. This patch series [1] came with a link to the previous > patch series [2]. > > I didn't, cannot, and shouldn't contain hundreds of links to the hundres > of responses to this topic over the past 10 years. Sorry for being unclear; by links I meant either direct or indirect ones. Your series came with a link to the previous series. The previous series, however, only contained a link to a series you were basing upon rather than to a series which contained the changes you were resubmitting. Thus, following the links in each submission would not get you back to the old discussions (I double checked). Also, this particular point was not meant as a critique of your current submission. I don't even think it's all that big a deal for the previous submission either (it's an easy oversight to make given that Junio submitted a portion of one of your old series). My point was simply that Alex didn't need to feel bad for not having been aware of all the old discussions; even if he had tried to dive deep by recursively following all the links, he wouldn't find it.