All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Goss Geppert <gg.oss.dev@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	christian w <usebees@gmail.com>,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dir: consider worktree config in path recursion
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 07:29:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BGXRzYCvyM38dEUvQ125+VtRu++7L9UiRz98u+1=Lov7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7d6sm3e0.fsf@gitster.g>

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:37 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Goss Geppert <gg.oss.dev@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> > index f2b0f24210..a1886e61a3 100644
> > --- a/dir.c
> > +++ b/dir.c
> > @@ -1893,9 +1893,31 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
>
[...]
>
> > +                     real_gitdir = real_pathdup(the_repository->gitdir, 0);
>
> This function is repeatedly called during the traversal.
>
> How expensive is it to keep calling real_pathdup() on the constant
> the_repository->gitdir just in case it might be the same as our true
> GIT_DIR?

I agree that treat_directory is called many times, but this
real_pathdup() call is inside the "if (nested_repo)" block, so this
new real_pathdup() invocation should occur very seldom.  Or are you
worried about cases where users have *very* large numbers of bare
repositories nested under the working directory?  Even in that case,
which seems pathological to me, I'd suspect the
is_nonbare_repository_dir() ->
read_gitfile_gently()/is_git_directory() codepath (used to determine
the value of nested_repo) would be much more expensive than this call
to real_pathdup(), so would it be worth trying to optimize this
real_pathdup() call away even in that rare case?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05 20:32 [RFC PATCH 0/1] dir: consider worktree config in path recursion Goss Geppert
2022-05-05 20:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Goss Geppert
2022-05-07  3:26   ` Elijah Newren
2022-05-07 17:59     ` oss dev
2022-05-06 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Junio C Hamano
2022-05-06 20:00   ` oss dev
2022-05-10 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Goss Geppert
2022-05-10 17:15   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Goss Geppert
2022-05-11 16:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-20 19:45       ` oss dev
2022-05-24 14:29       ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2022-05-24 19:45         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-25  3:46           ` Elijah Newren
2022-05-11 23:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-20 20:01       ` oss dev
2022-05-23 19:23     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-30 18:48       ` oss dev
2022-05-10 17:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dir: minor refactoring / clean-up Goss Geppert
2022-05-11 16:51     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-20 20:03       ` oss dev
2022-05-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] dir: traverse into repository Goss Geppert
2022-05-20 19:28   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Goss Geppert
2022-05-20 19:28   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dir: cache git_dir's realpath Goss Geppert
2022-05-24 14:32     ` Elijah Newren
2022-05-20 19:28   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] dir: minor refactoring / clean-up Goss Geppert
2022-06-16 23:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] dir: traverse into repository Goss Geppert
2022-06-22  4:57   ` Elijah Newren
     [not found] ` <20220616231956.154-1-gg.oss@outlook.com>
2022-06-16 23:19   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Goss Geppert
2022-06-16 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] dir: traverse into repository (resending) Goss Geppert
     [not found] ` <20220616234433.225-1-gg.oss@outlook.com>
2022-06-16 23:44   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dir: traverse into repository Goss Geppert
2022-06-16 23:44   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] dir: minor refactoring / clean-up Goss Geppert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABPp-BGXRzYCvyM38dEUvQ125+VtRu++7L9UiRz98u+1=Lov7A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=gg.oss.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=usebees@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.