From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753698AbbC3Tn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:43:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:34012 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752752AbbC3Tn1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:43:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5519A6D8.9060806@gmail.com> References: <20150327143201.GG21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <55158F25.9040100@gmail.com> <20150327172059.GK23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <551594DD.7050705@gmail.com> <20150327201534.GD6291@redhat.com> <20150327215942.GL23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150328075549.GG27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <551986BC.3000409@gmail.com> <20150330193318.GF23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5519A6D8.9060806@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:43:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, record: Add clockid parameter From: Stephane Eranian To: David Ahern Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Olsa , Linus Torvalds , LKML , John Stultz , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:41 PM, David Ahern wrote: > On 3/30/15 1:33 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:24:12AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: >>> >>> This works but the result is not always intuitive as to why it failed. >>> >>> On a kernel that does not support the clock id you get: >>> $ perf sched record -k mono -- sleep 1 >>> Error: >>> clockid not supported. >>> >>> And on a kernel that supports clockid but not for NMI: >>> >>> $ perf record -k realtime -a -- sleep 1 >>> Error: >>> clockid not supported. >>> >>> --> H/W counters so realtime is not allowed >>> >>> Same message though different root causes. >> >> >> Heh, ok I can fudge that :-) >> > > What about having the kernel return 'not supported' error for the latter -- > H/W counters with unsafe clock? I have reassembled all the pieces from Peter's patch. I will post it with V6 of the JIT patches today.