From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com (mail-lf1-f41.google.com [209.85.167.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7272F83 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 04:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z13so30849206lfd.9 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dC0Ua26Rxhnd0n6CHTRnAJbktP1VUUbdUEYM+ldETTs=; b=oLz758tToKci7zsi0yL0Scc7eybfO9b01MpTabJVy82AvrHxAm2Q8Bl580gyU51ORl 5O+hqfRQo/6iYzb6O/esTi7MhnB6inJ0UZ/cuMm5NCWSGF2LNtJrP8UzjS/jpcV3dYad niAlpUWRvdSPNLTDAVSOb0zS9baNZ+yioNktaRnNcad2e6nypv+8Y4eSUqBy996u3E+p dzuLhBxP2Nin+DHWvtnMYL4gfn2ujPEJkjlcfStQ5exWrdbLtmwnLwNSGW87LDnt9nVW 0diE7nHwTIYX3X25SJy70YHdEdFqr+IDG6Fbh5R/Y3Fd7APM7uiRGoj+GA3ywBCA3jQF xLQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dC0Ua26Rxhnd0n6CHTRnAJbktP1VUUbdUEYM+ldETTs=; b=QIn2lXZGgUcvauimKBC2chFnKPeQm18mdt2tvfGOP6b6g9ovKfez2ixhVG4XLl06aF 3SgNgXDIfQ3OixzDHhSEClUlrBBRE0T0JwZfGHEkqZsM1duQuojjhnqH47vKtJ8zOQLA Pmp/QGTiW2fRSsMJFghB+RT4hULdXa4K1rUxq8WMQHRzf2bDr3S3hspkEi+g6hwNOVJW KJDuIchhO7ujqArzwvvU5KO9mlHq1etjxbHFObkx5me1Vb07bP6mCsoNSd+ZBOaNWMET V5PsbugRp68Q0IFgv+dTWZZM8TgGnLMJ3AXo7r6KOBSF39RMAkK8M+dls9juYvM4glWx gddw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jlsfpeueI0hRbhKUCIWSESpnkaQ3jgcLCC4LJXCJTfFEWv8v/ oxqRW4LAeHeGxexFw6X8nfdB+V8GTA2dc9WgPH6x3w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmV9SsVkwYJidvbnM4iWS8L0mm8LtiTIuV/aB/PYpvnOKcYLGWvpGibFQPijvf3rE6GcpLQP9erwMtTMvFSCo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:138e:: with SMTP id p14mr3589595lfa.47.1618633455136; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:24:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0fa191715b236766ad13c5f786d8daf92a9a0cf2.1618388989.git.npache@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Gow Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 12:24:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Nico Pache , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Brendan Higgins , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Networking , rafael@kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , "Theodore Ts'o" , mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Matt, > Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to > net-next with other patches. > Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to > linux-next? Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that way too, then, IMHO. The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve itself when they pick up the last patch. At the very least, this shouldn't cause any conflicts with anything we're doing in the KUnit tree. Cheers, -- David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431D3C433B4 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A595611ED for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231941AbhDQEYr (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:24:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229465AbhDQEYo (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:24:44 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7174C061574 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 12so47708555lfq.13 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dC0Ua26Rxhnd0n6CHTRnAJbktP1VUUbdUEYM+ldETTs=; b=oLz758tToKci7zsi0yL0Scc7eybfO9b01MpTabJVy82AvrHxAm2Q8Bl580gyU51ORl 5O+hqfRQo/6iYzb6O/esTi7MhnB6inJ0UZ/cuMm5NCWSGF2LNtJrP8UzjS/jpcV3dYad niAlpUWRvdSPNLTDAVSOb0zS9baNZ+yioNktaRnNcad2e6nypv+8Y4eSUqBy996u3E+p dzuLhBxP2Nin+DHWvtnMYL4gfn2ujPEJkjlcfStQ5exWrdbLtmwnLwNSGW87LDnt9nVW 0diE7nHwTIYX3X25SJy70YHdEdFqr+IDG6Fbh5R/Y3Fd7APM7uiRGoj+GA3ywBCA3jQF xLQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dC0Ua26Rxhnd0n6CHTRnAJbktP1VUUbdUEYM+ldETTs=; b=MyACeSMtj6zYQDKhWNmWEq7CNS1e13Qe1bXnYcDXl8dBmc90qqfbvxzJi77g8wHvRr us1MsJmXot7i/SpBrjdrIquydxu97tzKHMYfNRwV1Hg9FXdGUKhMSMasvY8TNwxEkiLX VnMwGokReABewg7Z8LKa5JwtJlIyG5WAtz3u4JUwGwFenV61m8HM/zQPy8l4EGDDLGIA BEsmoU6vQxBw0/fLLgbfMAN67rOgGVfMHm9Io+xxWP9tJQpfuhy3buN8NkCjE0yfjLVY zpUdMuiUw8oJ5imrcgSkZboPhbQH1LqwAdZdIA0iHShwSnV8sVPy7DOYmZW+HMXmdmZJ L02g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316odRAAH1UrYGXc/ZacTl3w0fEG2YIgn5drjr3nmzEPa558ZxG IR20NOzkgBc1vRL2paqqBMYuDcnRVFYQav0Vyt92PQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmV9SsVkwYJidvbnM4iWS8L0mm8LtiTIuV/aB/PYpvnOKcYLGWvpGibFQPijvf3rE6GcpLQP9erwMtTMvFSCo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:138e:: with SMTP id p14mr3589595lfa.47.1618633455136; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:24:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0fa191715b236766ad13c5f786d8daf92a9a0cf2.1618388989.git.npache@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Gow Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 12:24:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Nico Pache , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Brendan Higgins , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Networking , rafael@kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , "Theodore Ts'o" , mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Matt, > Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to > net-next with other patches. > Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to > linux-next? Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that way too, then, IMHO. The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve itself when they pick up the last patch. At the very least, this shouldn't cause any conflicts with anything we're doing in the KUnit tree. Cheers, -- David