On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code. As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other architectures. That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real topic for bikeshedding is the name. - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name? - Do we want to include the architecture in the name? Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc? > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Brendan Higgins > Cc: David Gow > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > .../bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..dfe6da4796e8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: KUnit > + > +maintainers: > + - Brendan Higgins > + - David Gow > + > +description: > + KUnit board used to unit test the Linux kernel in User Mode Linux (UML). > + > +properties: > + $nodename: > + const: "/" > + compatible: > + const: linux,kunit > + > +additionalProperties: true > + > +... > -- > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/ > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git >