All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: LKML admins (syzbot emails are not delivered)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:52:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABXOdTcS6u=Pcb0y1jc9Muo7F9zu8Mvs=c8rcW+9z4g7QJd+Ng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+bphk2t0i1oxjy=jNDmVO=OfjbitM=vdcMMDOd0zS-jGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:38:42AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> Sometimes the branches on linux-next are experimental crap.  If someone
>>> adds an experimental memory allocator to linux-next before discovering
>>> it causes all kinds of problems I don't want bug reports about my code
>>> not being able to allocate memory because the memory allocator was bad.
>>>
>>> If you don't have the resources to test the individual branches of
>>> linux-next please just test Linus's tree.   That will be much more
>>> meaningful and productive.
>>
>> I have to agree with Eric here, the reason why Fengguang Wu's 0-day
>> testing robot is much better received by developers is that he does
>> not test linux-net,
>

Interesting. Assuming that refers to linux-next, not linux-net, that
may explain why linux-next tends to deteriorate. I wonder if I should
drop it from my testing as well. I'll be happy to follow whatever the
result of this exchange is and do the same.

Guenter

> I will remove linux-next if there is a general agreement that it's not
> useful. Though, I've heard different opinions from kernel developers
> as well. I will write a separate email asking what branches should be
> tested.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-04  9:09 LKML admins (syzbot emails are not delivered) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04  9:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-04  9:56   ` Ozgur
2018-01-04 15:31     ` David Miller
2018-01-04 19:11       ` Ozgur
2018-01-04 11:03   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04 11:04     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04 11:20       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-04 15:35         ` David Miller
2018-01-15  9:43           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-01 16:22         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-08 20:03           ` David Miller
2018-03-12  8:56             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-12 14:03               ` David Miller
2018-01-04 23:50       ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-08 12:01         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-08 12:11         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04  9:25 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04  9:38   ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-04  9:56     ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04 11:09       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04 11:18         ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-15 10:08           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-15 13:08             ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-15 13:38               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-15 13:53                 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04 15:23         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-01-15 10:54           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-15 12:54             ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-15 13:02               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-15 16:16                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-01-16 18:01                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-15 16:38             ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-01-16  7:12               ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-16  7:51                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-16  9:52                   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-01-16  9:56                     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-16  9:58                       ` Guenter Roeck
2018-01-16  7:59                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-16 11:19                   ` Fengguang Wu
2018-01-16  8:31                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-16 23:13                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-17  8:06                     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-17 16:53                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-17 17:16                         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-17 22:27                           ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2018-01-16  8:34                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-24 16:04                   ` Alan Cox
2018-01-24 17:06                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-01-24 17:32                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-16 18:20               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-17  8:13               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-04 21:38         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABXOdTcS6u=Pcb0y1jc9Muo7F9zu8Mvs=c8rcW+9z4g7QJd+Ng@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=groeck@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.