From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrey Korolyov Subject: Re: Deep-Scrub and High Read Latency with QEMU/RBD Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:34:32 +0400 Message-ID: References: <5220C23A.8010709@cloudapt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:56984 "EHLO mail-vc0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756436Ab3H3Re5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:34:57 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hf12so1524766vcb.13 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:34:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5220C23A.8010709@cloudapt.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mike Dawson Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" You may want to reduce scrubbing pgs per osd to 1 using config option and check the results. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Mike Dawson wrote: > We've been struggling with an issue of spikes of high i/o latency with > qemu/rbd guests. As we've been chasing this bug, we've greatly improved the > methods we use to monitor our infrastructure. > > It appears that our RBD performance chokes in two situations: > > - Deep-Scrub > - Backfill/recovery > > In this email, I want to focus on deep-scrub. Graphing '% Util' from 'iostat > -x' on my hosts with OSDs, I can see Deep-Scrub take my disks from around > 10% utilized to complete saturation during a scrub. > > RBD writeback cache appears to cover the issue nicely, but occasionally > suffers drops in performance (presumably when it flushes). But, reads appear > to suffer greatly, with multiple seconds of 0B/s of reads accomplished (see > log fragment below). If I make the assumption that deep-scrub isn't intended > to create massive spindle contention, this appears to be a problem. What > should happen here? > > Looking at the settings around deep-scrub, I don't see an obvious way to say > "don't saturate my drives". Are there any setting in Ceph or otherwise > (readahead?) that might lower the burden of deep-scrub? > > If not, perhaps reads could be remapped to avoid waiting on saturated disks > during scrub. > > Any ideas? > > 2013-08-30 15:47:20.166149 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853931: 20672 pgs: 20665 > active+clean, 7 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 5058KB/s wr, 217op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:21.945948 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853932: 20672 pgs: 20665 > active+clean, 7 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 5553KB/s wr, 229op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:23.205843 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853933: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 6580KB/s wr, 246op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:24.843308 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853934: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 3795KB/s wr, 224op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:25.862722 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853935: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 1414B/s rd, 3799KB/s wr, 181op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:26.887516 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853936: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 1541B/s rd, 8138KB/s wr, 160op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:27.933629 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853937: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 14458KB/s wr, 304op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:29.127847 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853938: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 15300KB/s wr, 345op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:30.344837 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853939: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 13128KB/s wr, 218op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:31.380089 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853940: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 13299KB/s wr, 241op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:32.388303 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853941: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 4951B/s rd, 8147KB/s wr, 192op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:33.858382 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853942: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64556 GB / 174 TB avail; 7029B/s rd, 3254KB/s wr, 190op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:35.279691 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853943: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 1651B/s rd, 2476KB/s wr, 207op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:36.309078 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853944: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 3788KB/s wr, 239op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:38.120343 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853945: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 4671KB/s wr, 239op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:39.546980 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853946: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 13487KB/s wr, 444op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:40.561203 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853947: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 15265KB/s wr, 489op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:41.794355 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853948: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 7157KB/s wr, 240op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:44.661000 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853949: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 4543KB/s wr, 204op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:45.672198 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853950: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 3537KB/s wr, 221op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:47.202776 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853951: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 0B/s rd, 5127KB/s wr, 312op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:50.656948 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853952: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 32835B/s rd, 4996KB/s wr, 246op/s > 2013-08-30 15:47:53.165529 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v9853953: 20672 pgs: 20664 > active+clean, 8 active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 38136 GB data, 111 TB used, > 64555 GB / 174 TB avail; 33446B/s rd, 12064KB/s wr, 361op/s > > > -- > Thanks, > > Mike Dawson > Co-Founder & Director of Cloud Architecture > Cloudapt LLC > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html