From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan van der Ster Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:48:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1456736629334.47610@croc.ru> <191489558.55229005.1456744289131.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1456745435596.21796@croc.ru> <56D45CCC.8010608@dachary.org> <20160302010625.GA10914@onthe.net.au> <1456913706999.87255@croc.ru> <56D6CF42.7080909@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:36599 "EHLO mail-lf0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752873AbcCBMsr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:48:47 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l83so86796891lfd.3 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com. [209.85.215.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jr10sm5551100lbc.42.2016.03.02.04.48.43 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l13so22078269lfb.1 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:48:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56D6CF42.7080909@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Odintsov Vladislav , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "ceph-users@ceph.com" Hi Loic, On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 02/03/2016 17:15, Odintsov Vladislav wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it looks very strange, that LTS release suddenly stopped support of = one of OS'es in the middle of lifecycle. Especially when there are no t= echnical problems. >> How can we help community with building hammer branch officially? >> > > Hi, > > I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to continue = building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of supported platform= s (which inclues 12.04 and el6)". In other words, the old OS'es are sti= ll supported. Their absence is a glitch in the release process that wil= l be fixed. > BTW, has there been any discussion to do 0.94.7 on a shorter interval? There is at least one unfortunate regression in .6: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14873 Cheers, Dan > Cheers > >> ________________________________ >> Regards, >> >> Vladislav Odintsov >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: ceph-users on behalf of Ch= ris Dunlop >> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 04:06 >> To: Sage Weil >> Cc: Loic Dachary; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users@ceph.com >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released >> >> Hi, >> >> The "old list of supported platforms" includes debian wheezy. >> Will v0.94.6 be built for this? >> >> Chris >> >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Sage Weil wrote: >>> The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on = the old >>> list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6). I think= it was >>> just an oversight that they weren't built this time around. I the >>> overhead to doing so is just keeping a 12.04 and el6 jenkins build = slave >>> around. >>> >>> Doing this builds in the existing environment sounds much better th= an >>> trying to pull in externally built binaries... >>> >>> sage >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > -- > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html