From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4D7C433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4B64E49 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236206AbhBHVVW (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:21:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46750 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236176AbhBHVVS (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:21:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E67C061786; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id g3so8542498plp.2; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:20:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R+r2jOyAlqjRMKHtvLPADXW3voMgq9h98r709KcrCLA=; b=on8PcE7z2qaHBS1NRAIcQDoBXSzdz3AfDUoAyrGwgMKmBymB8+KwNn/wQ8bxs/nE8W F4+jm/1ZrtEw2O3+RjFPADSLKNZtUYPAFmJqs8iB9H2lppiw+EQp7dBDi2JyI1AqPoPP H6pWUG78CBYYcLwAQvNvv7Q6OelL3XodzgyVOaPFcp12WC+VTD/ea+aaeULbzkwVCsAX NGtjR2iaRo/kU901b5AjsBBCjdSb6vFLAwL0t6Uzl48C9fxcV6ygj9O4biTxV/qn6lY3 oxt3BS01ghGL4UxY+wQpHaoyqqmD+gTxUanw5JXjP53YIBdZlvf7LSJd/TC1eicyLSL9 jOKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R+r2jOyAlqjRMKHtvLPADXW3voMgq9h98r709KcrCLA=; b=hHZh5F3PZrAEl2D+aOHkiDnZ/8JCJSLoKjKJGAUgoHEjf0SXNUpGT+5/733Z0vSccl 4SjwjJGbBzNhWkjcTWMmozeG2PML0/Ea0TcHqnRW3PFSQnaDvp8uGZ1QyWlOyANF3A4O RON9HSVhEgh7z3dBsm1WxM2UDaGls62DkIZpSc9bkrBotj8U4gb5JbhNb3PArWmdXjL3 UOCDEUM+JdCb9fhE1mXVV1mDCKpH1PtWj3ZMD/etRgKsI9JzcPJnPTHrmurE9a/GHppc +nqZRb+SNkykgn+4NFsrgtPXUNyJwfTMOXkeKz5vZm8h0q9DVQNl1TGu2njm1skhVNF9 zE0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532slb+ge+EJKQgiJ1dhdIduDdjngHtEWfKisb+urpca8D246XNT gq7rlPnHvnFMFxeuYwTwRBuM2Rg6cZQ444AjRQzivU0d X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlLrUw1rV3Nhhbhev6KiudY8wFgGQ6XXUwlUEyRbugwdSU+pRmpSd2OCN8pUcKOXmjuWx45WHicCFxjzqqWkU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:14cf:: with SMTP id jz15mr716661pjb.180.1612819238195; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:20:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210118041156.50016-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <161280637168.76967.9168707371952675235@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <20210208181954.GA276254@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20210208181954.GA276254@thinkpad> From: Jassi Brar Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:20:27 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add APCS support for SDX55 To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Viresh Kumar , Ulf Hansson , Bjorn Andersson , agross@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Devicetree List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:20 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2021-01-17 20:11:51) > > > Changes in v2: > > > > > > * Modified the max_register value as per the SDX55 IPC offset in mailbox > > > driver. > > > > > > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5): > > > dt-bindings: mailbox: Add binding for SDX55 APCS > > > mailbox: qcom: Add support for SDX55 APCS IPC > > > > I think I can apply the clk patches to clk tree without the mailbox > > patches, right? > > > > Yes, you can. Thanks for applying! > > Jassi: Can you please look into the mailbox patches? > They are compatible strings mostly... so assume it ok. cheers!