From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755796AbdGXPl7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:41:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:38527 "EHLO mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932684AbdGXPlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:41:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1498492513-29771-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1499446341-5956-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <5f2e4f3c-297b-c5f8-9244-399c1c4e2c21@arm.com> From: Jassi Brar Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:11:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Alexey Klimov , Loc Ho , Mark Rutland , "arnd@arndb.de" , Jassi Brar , Roy Franz , Harb Abdulhamid , Matt Sealey , ALKML , DTML , Nishanth Menon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 08/07/17 06:32, Jassi Brar wrote: >> Hi Roy, Matt, Nishant, Harb Abdulhamid, Loc, >> >> I have a gut feeling you guys were part of the SCMI spec committee. If >> so, could you please chime in? >> > > I take complete silence as no objection. > I take it as no self respecting developer/architect would stand by your FUBAR implementation of SCMI. SCMI calls mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer); whereas the API expects mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct controller_specific *xfer); As the maintainer I have tried to explain it to you in a dozen ways. If you still can't see how it's broken, you can't be helped. Checking out until someone else has any point. NAK. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jassi Brar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:11:48 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1498492513-29771-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1499446341-5956-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <5f2e4f3c-297b-c5f8-9244-399c1c4e2c21@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Alexey Klimov , Loc Ho , Mark Rutland , "arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org" , Jassi Brar , Roy Franz , Harb Abdulhamid , Matt Sealey , ALKML , DTML , Nishanth Menon List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 08/07/17 06:32, Jassi Brar wrote: >> Hi Roy, Matt, Nishant, Harb Abdulhamid, Loc, >> >> I have a gut feeling you guys were part of the SCMI spec committee. If >> so, could you please chime in? >> > > I take complete silence as no objection. > I take it as no self respecting developer/architect would stand by your FUBAR implementation of SCMI. SCMI calls mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer); whereas the API expects mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct controller_specific *xfer); As the maintainer I have tried to explain it to you in a dozen ways. If you still can't see how it's broken, you can't be helped. Checking out until someone else has any point. NAK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jassisinghbrar@gmail.com (Jassi Brar) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:11:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI In-Reply-To: References: <1498492513-29771-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1499446341-5956-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <5f2e4f3c-297b-c5f8-9244-399c1c4e2c21@arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 08/07/17 06:32, Jassi Brar wrote: >> Hi Roy, Matt, Nishant, Harb Abdulhamid, Loc, >> >> I have a gut feeling you guys were part of the SCMI spec committee. If >> so, could you please chime in? >> > > I take complete silence as no objection. > I take it as no self respecting developer/architect would stand by your FUBAR implementation of SCMI. SCMI calls mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer); whereas the API expects mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct controller_specific *xfer); As the maintainer I have tried to explain it to you in a dozen ways. If you still can't see how it's broken, you can't be helped. Checking out until someone else has any point. NAK.