From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3723C433ED for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3AA61206 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238170AbhDLVZN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:25:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33412 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231854AbhDLVZL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:25:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97DDC061574; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id b17so10390204pgh.7; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VPYHn6SoT76CwnEfuJiXdLvt5dm5XY4Tt5lyyt5vt4w=; b=qV/IEh+ZvH3L1nnBL9wgx3VQicsPPp6Esz78OZOadwMl9cgeUrFS9HYfFL6dwFQaie MhdHJRqGhWCJuRl7lqzIogbJpkW8goXzXFf01FiieZiisCFaizq8PjAUNjkHEFIy5DD2 OO7nDu7r29beu7k+qnWiT2DREcXunKYwt2osM90t+NvmYmw/ZmRzdU8yRqlaNRIO2Bm+ 0Kukge5SSPEZnavngl4G59g4+ZaXIXI4YY48JHw2zycGZvHlsEXsW/Pu61J7T+5r9t3L JBY06h58EdEs4V/IPQI4MTXO9A9YPeNTAuoiZPwmjqgY0e79XolJZwT4DzeBgTElY0Mo 285Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VPYHn6SoT76CwnEfuJiXdLvt5dm5XY4Tt5lyyt5vt4w=; b=goR0Bkm/fBhH/N0Bt8kndxfum7XaKjbP1EH+yelryNmcGfRifIYYbmqMUCxUqLqYKY lVDOyhYs5bzXS3JZ2AlSthrw3joUjtDWMNR60hylfHsaQHIQkz7DzMbOXCV1JDRwuNW2 nMTXndTmgq0hBtLcyr+7h4rDjvkfpoVXMZ/YxA7BGSuNkWdtbNR9c8HuNqNRcBfAi3u+ njh/E/vf+jRBgb+XGzEdBBkHlaSoA45aiM42h7LfJZqyxrpQOZEVS0ng8pvZ26ZpqeKW E9H2bWhreQmTtRpCeCRE/f5AXvdIi/ERjW+H/re1/W6qBO1pd1Y2ZAA29HpB/RCVqZmt sp6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zy4q+1KaagVoh7RcCW2QassjIMlLNjB4kuZy8W/KRv19h03lV KcukrIxKD5N1v4T7s0k6/iknY4bxTm/21QZ/sGA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyF5y7spTxqV3x57uu/69DBsM/7qBumstsLy8e5p46pfBx/40I9Dj8ryjWQPvK8CyBIHlPjKiEPhBtFYXJWN2s= X-Received: by 2002:a63:d815:: with SMTP id b21mr28907903pgh.217.1618262692310; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210212222304.110194-1-mgross@linux.intel.com> <20210212222304.110194-5-mgross@linux.intel.com> <20210305210140.GA622142@robh.at.kernel.org> <20210308202008.GA138795@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210308202008.GA138795@linux.intel.com> From: Jassi Brar Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:24:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver To: mgross@linux.intel.com Cc: Rob Herring , markgross@kernel.org, "arnd@arndb.de" , bp@suse.de, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com, Greg KH , Jonathan Corbet , palmerdabbelt@google.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, Peng Fan , Shawn Guo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniele Alessandrelli , Devicetree List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:20 PM mark gross wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:01:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, mgross@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > From: Daniele Alessandrelli > > > > > > Add DT binding documentation for the Intel Keem Bay IPC driver, which > > > > Bindings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. From a binding perspective, I > > don't really care what the driver architecture for some OS looks like. I > > continue to not understand what this h/w looks like. A block diagram > > would help as would understanding what blocks have multiple clients > > (mailboxes and xlink in particular). > I'm working to gather this info. > Do I pick the mailbox related patches (and which ones exactly) ? thanks.