From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752742Ab1HALK0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 07:10:26 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:49268 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752529Ab1HALKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 07:10:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1312196789.2617.447.camel@laptop> References: <1312196789.2617.447.camel@laptop> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6 From: Rolando Martins To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users , "Paul E. McKenney" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 09:42 +0100, Rolando Martins wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> is there any progress on the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED front? >> I don't know if this is related, but in 33-rt if I used a low (=100) >> cpu_runtime_us and cpu_period_us then I would get some freezes >> (something that does not happen in 2.6.39). >> >> Hi Peter, > No, I've been busy mopping up other things.. Ideally I'd rip out all the > current rt group code and put int the stuff Dario and Fabio are working > on, sadly they too are otherwise engaged atm. So, we would have sched_deadline support in rt? That would be amazing! > > I'll see if I can find a bit of time this week to stare at this mess. Ok! I hope to contribute to the effort at least by providing some testing... Thanks, Rolando > >