From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CDF600AC for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u14so2906593lbd.14 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:23:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=QIgdW7Ge/QkowJfUnrhRKEJo5WT1FILAKCM2iA8wNuo=; b=cC132AubqVNUZiW9APToQkcMgQSIVRDUq9TyX+ldGaOe5sTjaTNN/gwwXoagBULPTB WR9KMSx2GrEQ7KDykh+PsbdleR3cneoDjG/+yBjMAqm35MWj8muVKD6EtRHNBCOGyE0Z N6lic1LqZpe1Wv6/OHtYrgmwKKx8h3rs764PXEX3akS+NHrItDab0BtyPqpp8VjzJO4k 4T9eDq3bmIMO6XCVcxOK0GqMJ55KKHeZrLnmtE0lggxJSS7JgQxP5pHkPRQix2LI7oAj hZkGaB9mmFMKK7RTcVW3Xdu58rPhkHAmY69F4IVTmY/lWfHb2fkhHqBLxsxCR8df9eMI KC8g== X-Received: by 10.112.139.72 with SMTP id qw8mr2512543lbb.16.1389317009799; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:23:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kergoth@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.22.167 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:23:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140109233510.GO3709@jama> References: <52CEEE43.1090209@linaro.org> <20140109233510.GO3709@jama> From: Chris Larson Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:23:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PSp5QBRlAqLdkJH24Aj0x4sRHAU Message-ID: To: Martin Jansa Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: unmaintained layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:23:30 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112c1bad9807904ef9392b0 --089e0112c1bad9807904ef9392b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here > > > is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it > > > be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are > > > suspected of being, unmaintained? > > > > Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? > Versus an > > opt-in query ? > In case we're sticking to opt-in rather than opt-out, meta-mentor, meta-sourcery, meta-ro-rootfs, and meta-tracing are maintained by Mentor Graphics at this time. :) -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics --089e0112c1bad9807904ef9392b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
> <trevor.woerner@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> > is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> > be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> > suspected of being, unmaintained?
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
> opt-in query ?

In case we're sticking to opt-in rather than opt-out, meta-mentor, meta-sourcery, meta-ro-rootfs, and meta-tracing are maintained by Mentor Graphics at this time. :)
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
--089e0112c1bad9807904ef9392b0--