On 10 May 2018 at 10:33, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> On 10 May 2018 at 16:47, Dan McGregor <danismostlikely@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm with Khem. meta-darwin and meta-mingw are things, even if they
>> haven't been updated in years. If interest arises they shouldn't have
>> too many barriers to starting development again. I've also started to
>> attempt to build on a FreeBSD host.
>
> meta-mingw builds Windows binaries from Linux and meta-darwin builds
> Darwin binaries from Linux, so they're not relevant.

Neat, I only took a quick look; I guess I misinterpreted their purposes.

>
> People *are* at least trying to use Windows Subsystem for Linux to
> build Yocto on Windows, but I suspect as far as bitbake is concerned
> that is Linux.  There's no practical way we can build on macOS right
> now due to the recent security changes.

When I tried, early in the WSL testing, bitbake wouldn't start due to
some missing syscalls. inotify related, IIRC.

>
> Builds on BSD would be interesting, I'm curious as to how much breaks
> from GNU userland expectations and whether the build override is
> actually useful.

The problem I'm running into right now is pseudo. FreeBSD uses a
different API for extended attributes, so all the various xattr_...
things don't work. I might need to make it depend on a port of the
xattr wrappers.

Outside of that, I've been using a FreeBSD hosted cross toolchain for
embedded Linux for years. It works well on its own. Hopefully the
build-* overrides will be helpful for the small differences I've
noticed.

>
> Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core