On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:13:28AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:52:45AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: > > > > Greetings, I am trying to learn "wic" and have been confused as how > to create a "live" style image. I am following " > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.5.2/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#creating-partitioned-images" > but am getting confused on the target to use to create the a file system > that has a single squashfs file containing my root file system. > > > > > > > > My desired partition layout is as follows: > > > > 40MiB 40MiB 300MiB > > > > > +--------------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ > > > > | BOOT (esp) | DATA (fat) | ROOT (live) > | > > > > > +--------------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ > > > > > > > > BOOT - efi boot partition with kernel and initramfs > > > > DATA - generic fat filesystem to hold configuration files > > > > ROOT - an ext4 filesystem that contains a single os.img, which is a > squashfs file. > > > > > > > > I have ROOT and DATA figured out but I am at a loss as how to > generate the os.img file and copy it into ROOT. If I generate the os.img > file with bitbake and then use the "-r" option to manually supply a > directory structure it works, but I would rather have it done from a wks > file for automation reasons. > > > > > > > > Any hints? > > > I'd suggest to use wic image type and generate your image by bitbake. > > > You can find example wic-image-minimal.bb and wic-image-minimal.wks > in ../meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/ > > > > > This is where I started. I was able to make it work but not with my > configuration above. It looks like I can use a type of "fsimage" for my > "ROOT" partition, but I have not been able to figure out the syntax there > yet. For "BOOT" I am at a complete loss. In theory "bootimg-efi" but > there doesn't seem to be a way to provide an initramfs. > > How about creating recipe to prepare content or your boot partition and > then using --source rootfs --rootfs-dir= ? > This is much more generic way of creating partitioned images from my > point of view. Image recipes should take care of content and wic takes > care of > putting that content into partitions according to the partitioning > scheme described in .wks > > Does it make sense for you? > > > > > > You can probably do the same by using wic plugins, but I'd not suggest > > > to go this way. Using wic image type is simpler, more consistent, > easier to do and provides higher level of automation. > > > > Is using the wic image type and a plugin mutually exclusive? > No, not at all. However, I personally found the way I described above > more consistent, flexible and easy to implement and maintain. > The thing is, it's likely the machine/bsp setting the WKS_FILE, yet in OE/yocto we prefer machine/distro/image to be orthogonal. If you're injecting machine specific logic into an image, that image isn't going to be generally useful for all machines, and so violates our philosophy. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics