From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1BrI-0003Pk-3A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:19:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1BrG-0005sy-0a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:19:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x341.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::341]:40960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1BrE-0005qM-OV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:19:53 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-x341.google.com with SMTP id t7so7704416otk.8 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 07:19:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190304151827.1813-1-davidkiarie4@gmail.com> <20190304151827.1813-2-davidkiarie4@gmail.com> <50ec8aca-252e-792f-9a9a-a5dc606eca9c@redhat.com> <546a3879-6cf6-b248-c6df-62489730be57@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Kiarie Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:19:01 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] update copyright notice List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka , Eric Blake , QEMU Developers , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:36 PM David Kiarie wrote: > i hope you don't find this offensive, Eric but i'm forwarding this messag= e > to all the people on this thread. > > i don't find anything exactly private in this email. > > [off-list] > > On 3/4/19 1:20 PM, David Kiarie wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:48 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > > > wrote: > > > >> On 3/4/19 4:18 PM, David Kiarie wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: David Kiarie > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > >> > > > > would i be wrong to say this patch received unwarranted scrutiny from > you, > > Philippe? > > David, please calm down, and don't write emails that can sound like you > are attacking your reviewers on list. Assume good intent - Philippe > reviewed your patch with the same level of scrutiny as many other > patches he reviews, and his question for your previous patch revision > about whether you intended to change the copyright year was not an > attack, but an honest question. > > Open source works best when anyone feels like they can contribute. > Copyright lines are an interesting beast - they carry legal > significance, so care should be taken that they aren't changed by > mistake, but at the same time, you do not have to know the code that the > copyright is protecting to ask an honest question about whether a change > is intentional. > it's simply not fair for me to waiting for you guys to merge this patch. i sent both, you can pick whichever. > > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org >