From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD08EC4332F for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1449771AbiDVQnu (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:43:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1449755AbiDVQns (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:43:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4DD5AA63 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id lc2so17404989ejb.12 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CoGqA9rNsKJzYU/Obb8AAvf20gVKLeXNXFwl6nZ00rM=; b=puSEmprmz1nabSt+ml3920aGPKkUVGoZm9P1z5qEs6WOb5oaEqNdPuB+XnBF/+pdaO BVteA6H2VgQlmb0Vq/J/n/1XVZvrvGQjt3mVj7lbZ/55jU+YzyVz0YPnKdWjffXAa8Sz MZZheTPjT0XiMePlwtP5H2lntWYI8T7f3sghXXsJd3g7Ti463gREa1RRPDULw3YuULJU V2eu6FowolcgcwIpjbYp+q6SYrrPz3TtrfOdT2/aZwIAQaPxpVJyN7CzTxgTka8GC3Wa WXEDYA8EWuQGKrc2twCsC4WwQ7w8TiQWt2zr4dmLhdutg4v2XDEey0Wxj5JTGpSZAciX TulA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CoGqA9rNsKJzYU/Obb8AAvf20gVKLeXNXFwl6nZ00rM=; b=sd0c187MN+dePLArOis5fA/1SKiyT2CLoYY52UcULq8wJTUgteLwYYsjb0YbybxMIf XEZLDGjweDLZwTNlQf/XZf5CF+e7LtTahULP2hUwNw5Z9NQsJ4imXe07dfED73gD8h6W xW0aBhZGzobBHbK9HJ8Ys4lh6w7rhc+5jWSJqfEfd9Fd/0KMnG22iOGzJzmxHl29aVlz Q2cSujEcCpZpuvDR55HRyS4nuI4SAuUjBuMB2PGlKeiPz7AwTaNW/bqOzH0N1S+W6hdp fABU7ByZ5IzbzJE0nhrqlBaxnZpFNjQ3XJWQHa25BNvNy558ijnkAJpF4pnXWFeuVKpl UTag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lj2xpWDiRm/+32/vGUiSiNy8W1SU0r72twFyuXictefs3eCBS gtBR0dQkPDVPmzGV/hNT6eC4pAf8oi6ILQKiFr3GIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoLmBU5Xg3Lxmb7MT8CNOOwTwJf10BbLeuL2aNNlpJcThtRrea/0k1l5jXVtMthl5n+035wmUrG4QqfMQQfso= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60c9:b0:6f3:47fb:df26 with SMTP id hv9-20020a17090760c900b006f347fbdf26mr3107234ejc.159.1650645652344; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: "T.J. Mercier" Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Vetter , Tejun Heo , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Jonathan Corbet , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Hridya Valsaraju , Suren Baghdasaryan , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Benjamin Gaignard , Liam Mark , Laura Abbott , Brian Starkey , John Stultz , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Shuah Khan , John Stultz , Carlos Llamas , Kalesh Singh , Kenny.Ho@amd.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Shuah Khan , kernel-team@android.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:53 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > > include resource limit enforcements. > > > > Changelog: > > v5: > > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 > > Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, > if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you > think this is real. > > confused, > > greg k-h I'm sorry for the confusion. I'll change this to PATCH in future revisions. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A2FAC433F5 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96B510E250; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F3F10E250 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id l7so17518239ejn.2 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CoGqA9rNsKJzYU/Obb8AAvf20gVKLeXNXFwl6nZ00rM=; b=puSEmprmz1nabSt+ml3920aGPKkUVGoZm9P1z5qEs6WOb5oaEqNdPuB+XnBF/+pdaO BVteA6H2VgQlmb0Vq/J/n/1XVZvrvGQjt3mVj7lbZ/55jU+YzyVz0YPnKdWjffXAa8Sz MZZheTPjT0XiMePlwtP5H2lntWYI8T7f3sghXXsJd3g7Ti463gREa1RRPDULw3YuULJU V2eu6FowolcgcwIpjbYp+q6SYrrPz3TtrfOdT2/aZwIAQaPxpVJyN7CzTxgTka8GC3Wa WXEDYA8EWuQGKrc2twCsC4WwQ7w8TiQWt2zr4dmLhdutg4v2XDEey0Wxj5JTGpSZAciX TulA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CoGqA9rNsKJzYU/Obb8AAvf20gVKLeXNXFwl6nZ00rM=; b=zgtqaht8BvSnqCZ0dt2ZNdQ26rE1y3xE8bl1+zMqjxw9vPfQqtS7GEe/toQv9T+oKb bj+TVUJaAzL02usVHRP8EjWkCXS4E0KTc/kNB2cNgUORMesAtrjCX2O/hBnxjhuxA9bW l++A+uK2CWTJbMDZH9NtfFJIXVkXOcrKBPaz1f+QW5rGhCywqyz/pRA4rWihKxzPyxcf /Vjc4Ho8EE90hZZXQHLPgf5t2Pv97bNYWB5nYhy9MxfMIh+EKnv14WbO7TiDzeIEMC/6 I14eQiejWxJDuL2orERwQfjDlLjirUSMvnkd6S6hqSW2bh+LNhd4omujrveqtEFzeINE Lr4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dXdj/RCQNHawXRZpwsN+rz1Z6ZUkFtiANF3r0lD41H93dMd0F OSiq9PcqhOgUutYeJfMVGAkIL58akPudP7C97fx6mw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoLmBU5Xg3Lxmb7MT8CNOOwTwJf10BbLeuL2aNNlpJcThtRrea/0k1l5jXVtMthl5n+035wmUrG4QqfMQQfso= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60c9:b0:6f3:47fb:df26 with SMTP id hv9-20020a17090760c900b006f347fbdf26mr3107234ejc.159.1650645652344; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: "T.J. Mercier" Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Carlos Llamas , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, John Stultz , Zefan Li , Kalesh Singh , Joel Fernandes , Shuah Khan , Sumit Semwal , Benjamin Gaignard , Jonathan Corbet , Martijn Coenen , Laura Abbott , kernel-team@android.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Todd Kjos , Thomas Zimmermann , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Hridya Valsaraju , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , Christian Brauner , Kenny.Ho@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Mark , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:53 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > > include resource limit enforcements. > > > > Changelog: > > v5: > > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 > > Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, > if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you > think this is real. > > confused, > > greg k-h I'm sorry for the confusion. I'll change this to PATCH in future revisions. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "T.J. Mercier" Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:41 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CoGqA9rNsKJzYU/Obb8AAvf20gVKLeXNXFwl6nZ00rM=; b=puSEmprmz1nabSt+ml3920aGPKkUVGoZm9P1z5qEs6WOb5oaEqNdPuB+XnBF/+pdaO BVteA6H2VgQlmb0Vq/J/n/1XVZvrvGQjt3mVj7lbZ/55jU+YzyVz0YPnKdWjffXAa8Sz MZZheTPjT0XiMePlwtP5H2lntWYI8T7f3sghXXsJd3g7Ti463gREa1RRPDULw3YuULJU V2eu6FowolcgcwIpjbYp+q6SYrrPz3TtrfOdT2/aZwIAQaPxpVJyN7CzTxgTka8GC3Wa WXEDYA8EWuQGKrc2twCsC4WwQ7w8TiQWt2zr4dmLhdutg4v2XDEey0Wxj5JTGpSZAciX TulA== In-Reply-To: List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Vetter , Tejun Heo , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Jonathan Corbet , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Hridya Valsaraju , Suren Baghdasaryan , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Benjamin Gaignard , Liam Mark , Laura Abbott On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:53 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > > include resource limit enforcements. > > > > Changelog: > > v5: > > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 > > Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, > if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you > think this is real. > > confused, > > greg k-h I'm sorry for the confusion. I'll change this to PATCH in future revisions.